安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
What I meant is maybe it there is a different reason then that the're just generous and don't think it deserves to be priced like all other AAA games, even though I think it is one of them considering they now have all the money in the world from Microsoft and it's one of the most anticipated games of 2024. It definitely is not a indy game. I am affraid there could be a disappointing reason why they priced it lower then the competition. Hope I'm wrong!
EDIT:
Oh I see. People complaining it's priced too high because the game will be just a couple of hours. Maybe that's actually the reason - the game is too short.
Seems like microsoft is doing their job
The original game isn't even worth the 30$ for an 8 hour experience with mediocre combat. More like 20$ max because at least the rest of the game is good.
This better be at least 30 hours long or it's not worth it no matter how good the game is.