Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Valravn represents the trauma she experienced in her isolation in the wilds.
Garmr represents Senua's father, Zynbel.
The actual mythological figures of Surtr and Garmr are heavily tied to the events of Ragnarok, while the Valravn is a Danish folktale, probably told to her by Druth.
And yes, the enemies Senua sees are real, but their appearances are transformed by her psychosis to fit the hellish narrative that her mind is basically involuntarily crafting. The people she kills are essentially a canvas on which her psychosis paints horrible things.
*edit*
I should also note that the game refers to Garmr as Fenrir, but it doesn't make much sense unless Ninja Theory subscribes to the not-so-popular theory that Fenrir and Garmr are actually the same being.