STEINS;GATE

STEINS;GATE

View Stats:
BeastBox Dec 22, 2017 @ 4:19pm
Quick question about plot near the end (spoilers, obviously)
So I just finished this after a bit of a visual novel binge and I'm mostly padding text so there's no spoilers in the hover. :) But while the game seems pretty strong as far as internal consistency goes, I did have one question, and it's a bit hard to do searches for plot holes when there's just as much chatter online about the game as the anime, so I don't know if this is answered or not ...

At the end, why does deleting the original D-email from the Echelon database in the present cause a timeline shift? That should only happen if they do something in the past, so if they could keep the email from ever getting detected in the first place, then I get it. Deleting it directly, two weeks later, in the current day should only result in them not having that record anymore ... there's still people hunting and aware of them that have already been dispatched. It's not a D-mail, it's not a time leap ... it's just changing a database entry. That shouldn't do jack to timelines or divergence or literally anything.
< >
Showing 31-43 of 43 comments
VOLIN RABBAH Jan 17, 2018 @ 6:11pm 
Originally posted by BeastBox:
Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
Changing the future in a way that there is no dystopia, the worldline changes to the Beta Attractor field
Again, this is literally the opposite logic of everything that has happened in the game. When you do something in the present, either you just switch timelines in the moment within the same attractor field, or things autocorrect themselves (or both). That's well established in the Steins Gate lore. At no point in the game does anything in the future affect the past, and there's a ton of evidence that the past doesn't give two craps about the future. That worldline wasn't caused by the dystopia, that world line simply points to it. The cause was the email, and the research SERN had been doing for decades prior. None of that was undone.

Okabe changes attractor fields by making enough alterations to the worldlines that he eventually shifts over. This is something Suzuha also emphasizes when they discuss the meter thing that measures divergence. Again, all very established lore.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
So yeah, changing the present does have an effect on Attractor fields.
Look, if you're not going to admit you're just making rules up, fine, but at least understand you haven't yet presented any arguments that would change anyone's mind. All of your posts are either assumptions, or blatantly contradicting the game.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
I didn`t mean that changes in the present don`t affect worldlines
Well you should, because it would be correct. :) An action in the present is simply an event on the worldline. It might cause a different event to happen, or the same event to happen differently, but it wouldn't cause a time leap or shift in worldlines and it sure as hell wouldn't change attractor fields. It would just be a thing you did, fated in that worldline. The only things that ever happen in the game which cause those phenomenon are actions which DIRECTLY change the past. And that's it. As a rule. Not one exception given. Everything else is your personal fan fiction.

Are we done here? I came looking for an answer which no one seems to have, so it looks like we'll have to agree to disagree. You've had ample opportunity to give a coherent explanation and none seems forthcoming. No need for either of us to waste further time.

You are the one not presenting arguments here. All you say is that it`s a estabalished rule when it isn`t.. The cause for the dystopia is that they capture Kurisu, she is key for their dystopia. Their experiments in the past don`t lead to their dystopia. Kurisu being alive and they capturing Okabe`s group because of suspicion is the condition for that. Until then it`s true that they only changed the worldline by altering the past, but that doesn`t mean it`s the only way, it was never said. The worldline knows what is going to happen, EXCEPT when it`s something that a person knows because of time travel, you may call it lazy, but that`s how it works. So by using knowlodge that the person isn`t suposed to know, that person can change the timeline in the present, because his action aren`t something fated in that worldline like it would normally be.

Suzuha didn`t say that he has to make enough alterations. Remember something called Divergence points? They are points in which any small alteration can change the worldline, it happened when Okabe sent the first d mail. He was undoing every d mail until then so he could get the IBN, not so he would make so many changes that he would change the attractor field. The only change the he needed to make was that last one. The condition for the existence of the Alpha Attractor field is SERN getting that message, which leads to their dystopia. Change that and the AF needs to change. As I said before, the worldline doesn`t really predict actions that happens due to knowlodge because of former worldlines, but it does predict "organic" actions, and that`s why usually you can`t change the wordline with present actions.

The condition for the existence of the Alpha is the dystopia. The worldline predicts what is going to happen in the future, the first d mail changes the attractor field because it knows that it will lead to the dystopia. Erase that message, cut SERN`s suspicion and the attractor field will change, since they can`t form it`s dystopia withou capturing Kurisu. That`s not something that would happen without knowing something due to timetravel, but i already stated that that`s a flaw in the "system", a way to cheat. What you don`t seem to get is that the Alpha AF ONLY EXISTS IF THERE IS THE DYSTOPIA IN THE FUTURE. Alpha doesn`t only points to it, it`s the condition of it`s existence. It can`t exist with any other kind of future. The future usually doesn`t affect the past, except that in this case the action the present leads to an event that is incompatible with Alpha Af, so the AF changes, and on Beta the past events are different, past is also reconstructed from the moment the divergence point was open. The wordline knows the future that is going to happen, and if it doesn`t suit it`s attractor field, it will change it. If the actions still lead to the dystopia, the AF won`t change, but if it does, it will. That`s not made up, it happens more than once in 0. Before that moment the future didn`t affect the past, it`s true, because there was no reason to until then since none of Okabe`s action had lead to a different future.

Btw, if you still won`t accept any kind of explanation, just ask this same question on The Steins;Gate reddit. My native language is not english as you probably noticed a long time ago, so I can`t really express my thoughts like I want, I start to loose focus as i can`t find the right words to say what I want. There people might be able to explain better.

Edit: Remember when Okabe was trying to save Mayuri and he couldn`t? That was because doing that would lead to a worldline change and the future wouldn`t be the one that was predicted, so convergence doesn`t let Okabe save her. Now, why convergence doesn`t just not let Okabe erase that message no matter what, THAT`S the problem.

Edit 2: I reread your question, and you say that there are still people after them and all this ♥♥♥♥. That may be a problem since the game assumes that by deleting that message SERN won`t try to raid the Lab. I can understand you complaiment at this point, but remember that Moeka had already stopped trying to get the IBN and they might stop spying on them after they delete the message. Not sure about this point though.

Last edited by VOLIN RABBAH; Jan 17, 2018 @ 6:30pm
VOLIN RABBAH Jan 17, 2018 @ 7:08pm 
Also, read this: http://steins-gate.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:5951

It doesn`t directly answer your question, but it explains how altering the present does have an affect on worlines. Everytime Okabe was time leaping and making different actions due to Reading Steiner, he was changing the worldline, but the alterations were so meaningless that it never triggered reading steiner. The action of erasing that first d mail is the only one that is big enough to cause a worldline change. Every other action had the same affect as the jellyman, they weren`t enough to cause a shift. Okabe was making micro changes to the worldline due to knowlodge adquired through time travel all the time. It`s never stated that the only way to affect worldlines is by altering the past.
BeastBox Jan 17, 2018 @ 9:02pm 
Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
You are the one not presenting arguments here. All you say is that it`s a estabalished rule when it isn`t.
I have given example after example of how it is. Literally every D-mail follows this pattern. Literally every action Okabe takes as a result of a future he negates by time leaping follows this pattern. If you can say I'm not presenting arguments when I'm presenting examples like that, then you really have been a complete waste of my time.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
Remember something called Divergence points? They are points in which any small alteration can change the worldline, it happened when Okabe sent the first d mail.
Yes, and it involves directly altering the past. You know, the rule you say I'm not giving examples for. Hell, even you're giving examples now, and you still don't get it.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
The only change the he needed to make was that last one.
And that's the problem you can't explain. That change was made in the present. It breaks the established plot mechanics. All I want is an explanation how.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
The condition for the existence of the Alpha is the dystopia.
By your own post, no it does not.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
What you don`t seem to get is that the Alpha AF ONLY EXISTS IF THERE IS THE DYSTOPIA IN THE FUTURE.
I don't get it because the game doesn't back it up, but my point is that even if it did back it up, it's still wrong. Timelines are well established to not care what happens in the future as far as the past is concerned; the story CONSTANTLY negates future causes of past events but preserves the past events. No where is this "predicting" you talk about mentioned. Worldlines don't predict, they simply exist. Suzuha goes over this in detail.

EDIT: Quote from the page you linked: "Sending my consciousness back has let me change some future events with more precision than D-Mail, but other events are locked in by convergence." .... "The future is always determined."

See? Locked in. Determined. Not predicting. The future is locked in and determined. The dystopia is not special in this regard.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
The future usually doesn`t affect the past, except that in this case the action the present leads to an event that is incompatible with Alpha Af
Nowhere does the game talk about "compatibility with the future" either. Again, I'm not interested in your fanfic.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
Btw, if you still won`t accept any kind of explanation, just ask this same question on The Steins;Gate reddit. My native language is not english as you probably noticed a long time ago, so I can`t really express my thoughts like I want, I start to loose focus as i can`t find the right words to say what I want. There people might be able to explain better.
I find reddit to be something of a cesspool. I just thought I asked here because I thought it would be an easy answer from a community who probably knows better than me. I am sorely disappointed.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
Remember when Okabe was trying to save Mayuri and he couldn`t? That was because doing that would lead to a worldline change and the future wouldn`t be the one that was predicted, so convergence doesn`t let Okabe save her.
That's not "prediction"; that's just fate. It's like how Okabe can't die because he already died in 15 years (remember how that tense is used?) Just like how no one can change how Okabe dies, no one can change the coming dystopia. It's a result, not a cause (and even if it were a cause, causality doesn't work like that here, as you yourself admitted).

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
Now, why convergence doesn`t just not let Okabe erase that message no matter what, THAT`S the problem.
I don't see it as a problem. The rule of paradoxes wouldn't allow him to delete it if it mattered, and even if he did, there should be no change at all because the email was already being acted upon. It's not like all these agents are going to suddenly forget why they're in the neighbourhood just because the email isn't in the database anymore. It' s already gotten far too much attention by SERN agents as an active issue. Hence why this is so odd. Deleting the email from the database should change literally nothing; it's too late by then.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
Also, read this: http://steins-gate.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:5951
Agreed with everything there. Doesn't refute any of my points.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
It doesn`t directly answer your question, but it explains how altering the present does have an affect on worlines.
Yeah, a MICRO effect on FUTURE timelines, diverging from the PRESENT moment. So everything I've told YOU. Thanks, I guess.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
Okabe was making micro changes to the worldline due to knowlodge adquired through time travel all the time. It`s never stated that the only way to affect worldlines is by altering the past.
Yes it is, actually. The microchanges only change the wordline in a small level, and -- this is important -- only from that point on. Because it's ... you know ... the PRESENT. Every change made in the present only affects the present. That link doesn't refute that in the slightest, and if nothing else, just gives more examples.

Again, are we done? If you had anything of an answer to give, I'd have heard it by now, and you must know that you've been completely ineffective at helping me. I think we're finished here.
Last edited by BeastBox; Jan 17, 2018 @ 9:09pm
VOLIN RABBAH Jan 17, 2018 @ 10:29pm 
Originally posted by BeastBox:
Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
You are the one not presenting arguments here. All you say is that it`s a estabalished rule when it isn`t.
I have given example after example of how it is. Literally every D-mail follows this pattern. Literally every action Okabe takes as a result of a future he negates by time leaping follows this pattern. If you can say I'm not presenting arguments when I'm presenting examples like that, then you really have been a complete waste of my time.

Just because it folows this pattern at those situations, it doesn`t mean you have a point. The last d mail is a different situation. D mails change the present by going to the past, ok. Doesn`t mean that the only way to shift the worldline is by doing that. Okabe`s actions, as i said, weren`t enough to change the worldline until then, it still doesn`t contradict anything I said.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
Remember something called Divergence points? They are points in which any small alteration can change the worldline, it happened when Okabe sent the first d mail.
Yes, and it involves directly altering the past. You know, the rule you say I'm not giving examples for. Hell, even you're giving examples now, and you still don't get it.

By altering the past is a way of shifting the wordline, when have i said that this is wrong? What I said is that that`s not the only way of doing it. Just because he altered it by using a d mail, doesn`t mean it`s estabilished that`s the only way. Whith knowlodge adquired by time travel he can chenage it as well. Of course, every time someone time travels the worldline changes, the thing is though, the difference between the worldlines isn`t that big, so he still knows what events are fated to happen on the current wordldline despite not having experienced them on it yet.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
The only change the he needed to make was that last one.
And that's the problem you can't explain. That change was made in the present. It breaks the established plot mechanics. All I want is an explanation how.

I said before, worldlines are tied to their future, everything on them is fated to happen. By altering what is supposed to happen the worldline shifts. The only way to know what was fated is by time leaping or by receiving information through a time traveler. That way you know what you are supposed to do to change the worldline. What you are saying is that Okabe constantly negate the future but the past is conserved, right? The thing is, the only time he actually really negates something that was fated to happen was when he erased that last d mail, before that he never did anything that changed the future drastically. Well, accpet for when he sent the first d mail, which made the Attractor field shift not because it changed the past, but because that message would led to SERN`s dystopia.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
The condition for the existence of the Alpha is the dystopia.
By your own post, no it does not.

Explain how? The worldlines, unlike you said, are tied to their future as well. Alpha only exists because of that first d mail, and it only changed the worldline because that message is important to the future since it gives time travel monopoly to SERN. See? The future having an affect on the present. Also, from the Steins;Gate wiki:

The Alpha Attractor Field is made up of World Lines ranging from 0% to 0.99%.


The final convergent result of the Alpha Attractor Field is the completion of the SERN Time Machine and the enslavement of humanity in a Dystopia headed by the Committee of 300.

All worldlines on the Alpha Attractor field, no exceptions, lead to SERN`s dystopia, it`s fated to happen. When Okabe deleted that message he was on a wordline situated on the Alpha AF. So if by doing that there isn`t going to be a dystopia anymore, the wordline needs to change. The worldline compromises it`s past, present and future. In S;G 0 is said that every event from a worldline is ''set on rock'', and this includes the future. Cheat on fate and you can change the wordline in the present by changing the future.


Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
What you don`t seem to get is that the Alpha AF ONLY EXISTS IF THERE IS THE DYSTOPIA IN THE FUTURE.
I don't get it because the game doesn't back it up, but my point is that even if it did back it up, it's still wrong. Timelines are well established to not care what happens in the future as far as the past is concerned; the story CONSTANTLY negates future causes of past events but preserves the past events. No where is this "predicting" you talk about mentioned. Worldlines don't predict, they simply exist. Suzuha goes over this in detail.

I already covered why the Alpha worldline is determined by the dystopia. Your point seems rather nebolous here. I`m quite sure that the future is indeed important to the past and prsent, just not the past from a former wordline. It`s true that it preserves the past events a lot, but that`s because most of the time there is no reason for the past to change by changing the future at most times, but not always. Want an example? On the first worldline John Titor had stopped by 1970. When he switches to the Alpha af though, he(she) only stopped by 2010. That because his first d mail changed the future. You may notice here that Suzuha`s first time travel seems to have gotten negated, that because that happens when changing the Attractor Field, not so much when only shifting worldlines on the same attractor field.

What I think that you are trying to say here is that the d mails arrived in the past even though the action of sending them in the future was negated. That doesn`t invalidate my point. Invalidating the act of sending the d mails isn`t enough to change the attractor field for example. It`s an action that can be covered by the Alpha attractor field, they are not huge convergence points and the worldline shifts to one in which Okabe never sent the dmail, but it arrived anyway. That last act of deleting the first d mail, though is different. It negates the future in a way that an event that is fated to happen on all alpha worldlines can`t happen, and that`s way there is a shift there. The past also changes because when shifting to a new attractor field, things work differently. Past events and time travel from the previous Attractor field are all reseted, which doesn`t happen when only shifting through worlines from the same AF(in this last case, a d mail that arrived from a different wordline won`t be "deleted'', for example, but it`s a strange element)


Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
The future usually doesn`t affect the past, except that in this case the action the present leads to an event that is incompatible with Alpha Af
Nowhere does the game talk about "compatibility with the future" either. Again, I'm not interested in your fanfic.

It`s not a fanfic, just what happens in the game. Just because they don`t use this exaclty word it doesn`t mean it`s something that i made up. Alpha is explicitly linked to SERN`s dystopia, and there is no worldline on that attractor field that doesn`t lead to it. By changing the worldline in a way that it doesn`t happen, the worldline shifts to another attractor field. The same way beta is linked to worldwar 3.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
Btw, if you still won`t accept any kind of explanation, just ask this same question on The Steins;Gate reddit. My native language is not english as you probably noticed a long time ago, so I can`t really express my thoughts like I want, I start to loose focus as i can`t find the right words to say what I want. There people might be able to explain better.
I find reddit to be something of a cesspool. I just thought I asked here because I thought it would be an easy answer from a community who probably knows better than me. I am sorely disappointed.

I`m sorely disappointed by how you are ignoring the fact that people from that site may help you better than someone who barely speaks english fluently. Just ask them, I guarantee to you they will be able to help you. If you sticked to discussion this long you want an answer, so don`t just ignore it.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
Remember when Okabe was trying to save Mayuri and he couldn`t? That was because doing that would lead to a worldline change and the future wouldn`t be the one that was predicted, so convergence doesn`t let Okabe save her.
That's not "prediction"; that's just fate. It's like how Okabe can't die because he already died in 15 years (remember how that tense is used?) Just like how no one can change how Okabe dies, no one can change the coming dystopia. It's a result, not a cause (and even if it were a cause, causality doesn't work like that here, as you yourself admitted).

I admit that prediction is wrong here. It`s more like the worldline "knows" what should happen. Okabe is fated to die in 15 years, but saying that no one can change how he dies is wrong. It`s possible to change the way, just not when. Well, if it wasn`t for the fact that in the end it`s actually possible to cheat over both convergence and fate.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
Now, why convergence doesn`t just not let Okabe erase that message no matter what, THAT`S the problem.
I don't see it as a problem. The rule of paradoxes wouldn't allow him to delete it if it mattered, and even if he did, there should be no change at all because the email was already being acted upon. It's not like all these agents are going to suddenly forget why they're in the neighbourhood just because the email isn't in the database anymore. It' s already gotten far too much attention by SERN agents as an active issue. Hence why this is so odd. Deleting the email from the database should change literally nothing; it's too late by then.

That`s exaclty my problem with it, it should be far too late by then, but for some odd reason it`s not. It can kind of be explained by the fact that Mayuri`s death was being delayed everytime he was undoing the d mails, so maybe at that worldline he had to time to erase it before they analyzed it. Why convergence doesn`t prevent him from doing it if it`s important, I have no clue.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
Also, read this: http://steins-gate.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:5951
Agreed with everything there. Doesn't refute any of my points.

It says that action in the present change the worldline in a samll; way, and that a present action that deviates far too much from the fated future would trigger reading steiner. Do you really agree with this? Because it doesn`t seem so.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
It doesn`t directly answer your question, but it explains how altering the present does have an affect on worlines.
Yeah, a MICRO effect on FUTURE timelines, diverging from the PRESENT moment. So everything I've told YOU. Thanks, I guess.

We agree on this. What we don`t agree is that that should shift the worldline and change the past, right? First of all timelines and worldlines are different. There is only one timeline and numerous worldlines, of which only one is active. Second, it affects the future of the wordline. Ther isn`t more than one active wordline, only one. So by changing the past because of information adquired through time travel, you are affecting the entirety of the worldline. If it deviates far too much from what was fated, then the worldline shifts. As much as you want to negate that the alpha worldine only exists as long as the dystopia happens, that`s well estabilished. Any worldline in which the dystopia doesn`t happen can`t be situated on the Alpha Attractor field. If the present action is enough to negate the dystopia, the wordline will shift to another attractor field, in which past, present and future are all different.


Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
Okabe was making micro changes to the worldline due to knowlodge adquired through time travel all the time. It`s never stated that the only way to affect worldlines is by altering the past.
Yes it is, actually. The microchanges only change the wordline in a small level, and -- this is important -- only from that point on. Because it's ... you know ... the PRESENT. Every change made in the present only affects the present. That link doesn't refute that in the slightest, and if nothing else, just gives more examples.

Only from that point on. Exactly. And by changing the present you change the future, right? So by making an action that changes the future in a way that it contradicts what was fated, the worldline shifts in order to reconstruct itself in a way that it supports the new events, it`s a new worldline. The wordlines are not tied from futures from previous wordlines (remember that everytime someone time travels the wordline shifts) but they are tied to their futures. Altering the present in way that makes the future completely different from what it`s fated will make the wordline shift the same way it shifts when changing it`s past. All the events from a worldline are semi fated to happen(incluiding the future), but it`s possible altere it by contradicting it. You can do it by d mails, or using information that you shouldn`t have in present, contradicting what was fated for the future.

Again, are we done? If you had anything of an answer to give, I'd have heard it by now, and you must know that you've been completely ineffective at helping me. I think we're finished here.

I already gave you many answers, none of which you seem to even give a second thought. At this point it`s just a battle of egos, and no one will ever admit being wrong here. I don`t like how we are starting to sound harsh at each other, and we will never be able to convince each other. I beg you to ask this question on Reddit, I`m pretty sure they can give you a better insight than me, since, as I said, I`m not even fluent on english. People there are much more into it than anyone here. So please, don`t just prevent yourself from asking there because you think that that is place is a cesspool. Also, i`m legitly curious, did you have former bad experiences with reddit to call it that way? I mean, it`s not the best place on the internet, but it`s certainly better than Steam`s forums for discussion. And again, please, consider my suggestion of posting this question on reddit. I wnat discuss this further, but the way it`s going i seems that if we were throwing insults at each other we would be doing the same progress. If you want to continue this discussion, i`d like to kind of restart it so we can see the points in which we disagree with, since i`m pretty sure we agree on most things, it`s just one or another thing we are having issues with. And don`t see this as a fight, but as a way to comprehend both points of view. Right know, this is, unfortunately looking like a fight, which i don`t think is healthy in any sort of way.


Edit: Realised that I formated this pretty badly, but you should be able to figure out what you said and what i said. Pardon me, I hardly ever use steam discussions.
Last edited by VOLIN RABBAH; Jan 17, 2018 @ 11:08pm
BeastBox Jan 17, 2018 @ 11:40pm 
Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
Originally posted by BeastBox:
I have given example after example of how it is. Literally every D-mail follows this pattern. Literally every action Okabe takes as a result of a future he negates by time leaping follows this pattern. If you can say I'm not presenting arguments when I'm presenting examples like that, then you really have been a complete waste of my time.
Just because it folows this pattern at those situations, it doesn`t mean you have a point. The last d mail is a different situation. D mails change the present by going to the past, ok. Doesn`t mean that the only way to shift the worldline is by doing that. Okabe`s actions, as i said, weren`t enough to change the worldline until then, it still doesn`t contradict anything I said.
What I'm saying is that you're making crap up. It's equivalent to saying the last D-mail worked because of magic pixie faries, and then defending it by saying the game never says there AREN'T magic pixie faries. We know how D-mails work; it's explained at length. So we know they aren't capable of this. Saying "this one is different" is irrelevant if you can't explain HOW it's different, and you have never even tried to do that.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
Originally posted by BeastBox:
Yes, and it involves directly altering the past. You know, the rule you say I'm not giving examples for. Hell, even you're giving examples now, and you still don't get it.
What I said is that that`s not the only way of doing it. Just because he altered it by using a d mail, doesn`t mean it`s estabilished that`s the only way.
So show the other way in-game. Otherwise you're still appealing to the magic pixie faries. Because, you know, you can't prove they DIDN'T use magic pixie faries, therefore it's an explanation by your logic, right?

Again, we know what D-mails do. They don't do this. So yes, it IS kinda the only way, unless the characters in the game say otherwise.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
Originally posted by BeastBox:
And that's the problem you can't explain. That change was made in the present. It breaks the established plot mechanics. All I want is an explanation how.
I said before, worldlines are tied to their future, everything on them is fated to happen. By altering what is supposed to happen the worldline shifts.
No, by altering what HAS happened, the worldline shifts. This is more pixie faries; show me anything in the game that demonstrates how a change in the present causes a shift in the timeline in the past, or how worldlines are tied to futures as a cause (ie: the dystopian future "causing" worldline alpha). Keeping in mind your own link disproves this.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
The worldlines, unlike you said, are tied to their future as well.
I said the futures are tied to the worldlines as end-results. You keep asserting that they are causes, but you have no evidence.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
Alpha only exists because of that first d mail, and it only changed she worldline because that message is important to the future since it gives time travel monopoly to SERN. See? The future having an affect on the present.
The email changed the past, which changed the future. It caused a whole chain of events, including Moeka's deployment, Kurisu's capture, etc. THAT is what changed the worldline. The future is the result of the change, not the cause. That's basic common sense, both in the game and real life.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
The Alpha Attractor Field is made up of World Lines ranging from 0% to 0.99%.

The final convergent result of the Alpha Attractor Field is the completion of the SERN Time Machine and the enslavement of humanity in a Dystopia headed by the Committee of 300.

All worldlines on the Alpha Attractor field, no exceptions, lead to SERN`s dystopia. When Okabe deleted that message he was on a wordline situated on the Alpha AF.
All of this is correct and no one disputes it.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
So if by doing that there isn`t going to be a dystopia anymore, the wordline needs to change.
THAT is completely false and does not follow logically from what you posted at all. Nowhere does it say that, you are making things up again. The wiki does not even hint at that. I think this is where your bad English is failing you ...

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
I already covered why the Alpha worldline is determined by the dystopia.
No you didn't. Everything you've quoted or linked agrees with me. Again, do you just want to play the "English is not my first language" card again and back out?

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
Want an example? On the first worldline John Titor had stopped by 1970. When he switches to the Alpha af though, he(she) only stopped by 2010. That because his first d mail changed the future.
Not the same thing; that only affects a change because he's essentially altering a future time travel (in the same way he can plan for Luca to do a time leap, which also triggered Reading Steiner). It still requires a direct change to the past, in this case Suzuha actually time traveling. No time travel is necessary for SERN to do what they're doing, because they're actively doing it right now in the present. Nowhere is it implied that SERN go back in time to invent time travel. This is just worldline stuff. So no, that's not an example. This only makes sense if you're still assuming that the dystopia causes the worldline, which there is no evidence for and is still your fanfic.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
It`s not a fanfic, just what happens in the game. Just because they don`t use this exaclty word it doesn`t mean it`s something that i made up.
Then show me where it's not made up. What chapter? Who says it? Because as we've already established, there's plenty in the game that contradicts that (convergence points, for example).

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
Originally posted by BeastBox:
That's not "prediction"; that's just fate. It's like how Okabe can't die because he already died in 15 years (remember how that tense is used?) Just like how no one can change how Okabe dies, no one can change the coming dystopia. It's a result, not a cause (and even if it were a cause, causality doesn't work like that here, as you yourself admitted).
I admit that prediction is wrong here. It`s more like the worldline "knows" what should happen.
Still wrong. Nothing in the game ascribes any knowledge to a timeline. The dystopia is simply the endpoint, the convergence, the final result awaiting everything that happens on Alpha. Like how Mayuri's death is a result. Or anything else. Not a cause, a result.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
That`s exaclty my problem with it, it should be far too late by then, but for some odd reason it`s not. It can kind of be explained by the fact that Mayuri`s death was being delayed everytime he was undoing the d mails, so maybe at that worldline he had to time to erase it before they analyzed it. Why convergence doesn`t prevent him from doing it if it`s important, I have no clue.
"I have no clue" is a perfectly valid answer to my initial post. In English, we call it a "plot hole".

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
It says that action in the present change the worldline in a samll; way, and that a present action that deviates far too much from the fated future would trigger reading steiner. Do you really agree with this? Because it doesn`t seem so.
Show me where on that page it says that a change in the present can trigger Reading Steiner. I said I agreed with the page, not you, and you're still making stuff up (or misreading it).

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
As much as you want to negate that the alpha worldine only exists as long as the dystopia happens, that`s well estabilished.
Show me where this is established. Suzuha only refers to it as one point on the worldline. It is never refered to as a cause. Even when they delete the D-mail from the database, they're doing it to jump back to Beta, not end Alpha by preventing the dytopia (because they know they can't).

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
Only from that point on. Exactly. And by changing the present you change the future, right? So by making an action that changes the future in a way that it contradicts what was fated, the worldline shifts in order to reconstruct itself in a way that it supports the new events, it`s a new worldline.
No, everything either autocorrects so everything happens anyway, even if the causes are different, or something happens to prevent a paradox (like Okabe magically dodging bullets). THAT is what happens. Again, THAT is what is established. The dystopia is an inevitable result, like Mayuri's death. You can't undo it, and it didn't cause the timeline anyway. There's no point discussing with you further until you let go of this silly notion, because your entire flimsy argument hangs off it and it's a lie.

Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
I already gave you many answers, none of which you seem to even give a second thought.
You invented the answers out of your butt. Why do they deserve a second thought?
Lynx_gnt Jan 18, 2018 @ 10:22am 
O_o' oh, sorry i didn't read what you already discussed here (its just too much). My apologies if reasonable answer has already been given. Again, just add few points to what i lready said earlier.
Originally posted by BeastBox:
Literally the second D-mail they sent was lottery numbers. :)
Well, they took some preventive measures, not all numbers are correct. And since this message didnt hold world line in alpha field, it was not enough to 'point at Okabe as a person with working time travel technology'.
Also what i forgot: D-mail exist only at the arrival point, but not at the sending side. So first D-mail was send from beta WL and technically it arrived at the same beta WL and lead to what i described earlier. But this immidiately contradicts with attraction field and fact that there is not a single WL in beta field where SERN rules the world. And because of that it switches from beta to alpha.
First D-mail was send from beta WL and arrived at alpha, and it doesn't exist at beta line anymore.
So again, when they were in alpha field, next to last thing they did was cancelling the Rounders attack on the lab for unknown amount of time (I want to add more to this, but that would be spolers). So at this moment SERN is not actively looking for Okabe. But at some point in future they will do this again. If Okabe deletes the D-mail before SERN start the hunt again, they wouldnt have any evidence at this point. And because of that they will not develop a time machine.
So, after hacking the database and deleting the D-mail SERN will fail to rule the world. And again, since SERN succeed in all alpha world lines, the active one switches from alpha to beta.
Kratos263 Jan 18, 2018 @ 9:20pm 
The reason is actually very simple, no need for that much thinking.

The reason the future becomes a dystopia is because SERN found out after that first e-mail Okabe sent to the past. In that worldline, future SERN even sent agents to the past, and we know this because the lab was directly connected to SERN, as we found out during the game.

Now, when they deleted the first message from SERN's database, SERN still had not acknowledged the existence of this message, so deleting it reverts everything to the beta worldline since they cannot act upon it anymore.

You may think they noticed it because the lab got raided by SERN, but once okabe negated the changes he made, the raids stopped and he never received the threat messages, which means deleting the message then is sure to change to the beta worldline.
Last edited by Kratos263; Jan 18, 2018 @ 9:20pm
BeastBox Jan 18, 2018 @ 9:52pm 
Originally posted by Kratos263:
The reason is actually very simple, no need for that much thinking.

The reason the future becomes a dystopia is because SERN found out after that first e-mail Okabe sent to the past. In that worldline, future SERN even sent agents to the past, and we know this because the lab was directly connected to SERN, as we found out during the game.

Now, when they deleted the first message from SERN's database, SERN still had not acknowledged the existence of this message, so deleting it reverts everything to the beta worldline since they cannot act upon it anymore.

You may think they noticed it because the lab got raided by SERN, but once okabe negated the changes he made, the raids stopped and he never received the threat messages, which means deleting the message then is sure to change to the beta worldline.
Again, the game establishes over and over that changing the future does not effect the past. It's like how sending a D-mail negates sending a D-mail, but the D-mail is still sent (it's always in the inbox, never the outbox). So those agents would still end up in the past, even if they never left the future.
Last edited by BeastBox; Jan 18, 2018 @ 9:53pm
Sorin Jan 24, 2018 @ 4:19am 
Originally posted by BOT Amadeus:
Sern has a system called Echelon, which captures messages related to time travel and puts people who sent them under suspition. NSA does something similar to catch terrorists.

Well I guess I'm also on that list then, since I like to joke about places I would like to bomb.

Also, I think yall need to stop arguing with the AI, they aren't sophisticated enough yet to challenge their own thought patterns.
Last edited by Sorin; Jan 24, 2018 @ 4:52am
May90 Jan 27, 2018 @ 9:12pm 
I thought about this as well, and here is what I came up with. Perhaps Echelon is not a simple database on a hard drive, but, rather, it might function somewhat like D-mails, where every saved piece of information is not just data, but is somehow directly connected to its appearance in the past. So, removing anything from that database has a similar effect on the world as sending a D-mail to the past to cancel another D-mail.

In this case, removing the original D-mail from the database shifted Okabe's consciousness to the worldline where the D-mail could never appear in that database in the first place, which is equivalent to it never having been sent.
daarklord Aug 3, 2018 @ 8:03am 
I just got to this point in the game and I am feeling very puzzled too.

Originally posted by Kawaiian Pizza:
Doing something in the present because of knowledge obtained from the future would change the timeline. Time leaping and sending D-mails has the same effect, the only difference is that D-mails can have a greater impact based on time/the butterfly effect.
If he were to send a D-mail to the past saying to delete the message it would do the same thing as time leaping into the past to do it himself.

The knowledge from the future causing him to take specific actions has the save effect as a D-mail. The reason why just saying hi to someone different after time leaping doesnt cause reading steiner to activate or anything is because its too small a change. Deleting his first D-mail is a massive event change which was enough to swap worldlines.

This is a good explanation.

I think the problem with this specific event is that, throughout the same so far, we've been lead to believe that physical actions taken have no effect, but d-mails have a lot of effect.

For example, Okabe taking Mayuri far away from the lab on the day of her death results in no change to the timeline, even though it is an action based on information from the future.

Contrast this with the cancellation d-mails, such as the one sent to Lukako's mom. That shifted the timeline by over 0.05%.

Now that we've been conditioned to believe physical actions don't change the timeline, and we see Okabe pressing enter, which is a physical action, it makes us scream out, "hey that's wrong!"

I'm still not very happy with this. Pressing enter happened AFTER the divergence, just as taking Mayuri and running happened AFTER the divergence. Why does one have more effect than the other?
糾う Aug 4, 2018 @ 5:20am 
Originally posted by daarklord:
I just got to this point in the game and I am feeling very puzzled too.

Originally posted by Kawaiian Pizza:
Doing something in the present because of knowledge obtained from the future would change the timeline. Time leaping and sending D-mails has the same effect, the only difference is that D-mails can have a greater impact based on time/the butterfly effect.
If he were to send a D-mail to the past saying to delete the message it would do the same thing as time leaping into the past to do it himself.

The knowledge from the future causing him to take specific actions has the save effect as a D-mail. The reason why just saying hi to someone different after time leaping doesnt cause reading steiner to activate or anything is because its too small a change. Deleting his first D-mail is a massive event change which was enough to swap worldlines.

This is a good explanation.

I think the problem with this specific event is that, throughout the same so far, we've been lead to believe that physical actions taken have no effect, but d-mails have a lot of effect.

For example, Okabe taking Mayuri far away from the lab on the day of her death results in no change to the timeline, even though it is an action based on information from the future.

Contrast this with the cancellation d-mails, such as the one sent to Lukako's mom. That shifted the timeline by over 0.05%.

Now that we've been conditioned to believe physical actions don't change the timeline, and we see Okabe pressing enter, which is a physical action, it makes us scream out, "hey that's wrong!"

I'm still not very happy with this. Pressing enter happened AFTER the divergence, just as taking Mayuri and running happened AFTER the divergence. Why does one have more effect than the other?
Deleting the D-Mail causes paradox, the world line changes to another attractor field because SERN loses the source of their time machine information, the dystopia is avoided, Suzuha can no longer come from that future so everything changes. In the world line at the moment when Okabe deletes the first D-Mail, SERN still hasn't noticed their actions.

The time leap machine changes the divergence only very slightly. Okabe can have a choice to act differently, but the result would always end up being the same as Mayuri dying, it's only the span of 2 days, any action he does during that time is completely irrelevant to the cause-effect of the whole attractor field, the world line is still authentic to the one he leaped from. Reading Steiner only triggers if the change is big enough to cause disparity between events and memories, but that can't happen when his consciousness travels to the past. (if we follow the Okabe who did the leap, he will notice the change, but that's meaningless to the narrative)
Last edited by 糾う; Aug 4, 2018 @ 5:34am
daarklord Aug 16, 2018 @ 5:01am 
Originally posted by loli kurisu:
Originally posted by daarklord:
I just got to this point in the game and I am feeling very puzzled too.



This is a good explanation.

I think the problem with this specific event is that, throughout the same so far, we've been lead to believe that physical actions taken have no effect, but d-mails have a lot of effect.

For example, Okabe taking Mayuri far away from the lab on the day of her death results in no change to the timeline, even though it is an action based on information from the future.

Contrast this with the cancellation d-mails, such as the one sent to Lukako's mom. That shifted the timeline by over 0.05%.

Now that we've been conditioned to believe physical actions don't change the timeline, and we see Okabe pressing enter, which is a physical action, it makes us scream out, "hey that's wrong!"

I'm still not very happy with this. Pressing enter happened AFTER the divergence, just as taking Mayuri and running happened AFTER the divergence. Why does one have more effect than the other?
Deleting the D-Mail causes paradox, the world line changes to another attractor field because SERN loses the source of their time machine information, the dystopia is avoided, Suzuha can no longer come from that future so everything changes. In the world line at the moment when Okabe deletes the first D-Mail, SERN still hasn't noticed their actions.

The time leap machine changes the divergence only very slightly. Okabe can have a choice to act differently, but the result would always end up being the same as Mayuri dying, it's only the span of 2 days, any action he does during that time is completely irrelevant to the cause-effect of the whole attractor field, the world line is still authentic to the one he leaped from. Reading Steiner only triggers if the change is big enough to cause disparity between events and memories, but that can't happen when his consciousness travels to the past. (if we follow the Okabe who did the leap, he will notice the change, but that's meaningless to the narrative)

Ah that's a good point. A d-mail isn't limited to the 2-days+ window of a time leap. His actions after each time leap, such as taking Mayuri and running, did not fix the actual divergence event.

If we think of the divergence not as a single point in time, but a single event, such as Okabe's sending a D-mail to Daru about Kirisu's murder, we can say Okabe's pressing enter changed the divergence EVENT, even if it happened at a later TIME.

It make sense to me when I think about it this way.
< >
Showing 31-43 of 43 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Dec 22, 2017 @ 4:19pm
Posts: 43