Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I had to go through and unlock the campaign missions the old way back in the day (last year). I actually enjoy the stealth missions to jump in and mess around and play for fun when you aren't "forced" to play them. Some of the DLC missions are the best of all, really fill out the campaign.
Yeah, but more often than not, your reserves and supplies are limited.
So going in guns blazing could go horribly wrong if you aren't careful.
Not everyone wants to babysit 6 soldiers to make sure they don't look the wrong way at the wrong time.
So because they gave up on a "hard" mission they never got to the other missions that they might enjoy more.
I think the change was good overall. You can choose not to do the missions out of order. I like choice. It's a personal choice that you alone can exercise.
Personally I liked the stealth missions. It makes keeping your soldiers alive important as opposed to Skirmish where you just get a almost unlimited number of replacements.
This is one of the reasons I like Conquest.
I wish the devs just included a way to skip a mission after a certain amount of fails, instead of just unlocking everything. I quite like seeing missions unlock after pulling them off.