Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
However, in single-player skirmish and ESPECIALLY the single-player campaign, I do feel as though I got my money's worth.
The Finland campaign is by far the most interesting, unique and for me enjoyable of all the campaigns. It helps that you get to play as a 'good' nation for once, and their ragtag underdog style lent itself to some excellent immersion.
edit: by 'good' I mean that Finland's record in the Second World War is arguably one of - if not THE - cleanest of all the belligerents, including all of the Western Allies. Tad ironic its an Axis nation.
I am not passing judgment on any nations entire population or anything before or after the conflict, merely the conduct of their govt/armed forces at the time.