Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I hope so. It's pretty unbalanced at the moment.
I already do. Some of these improvements should have been added to the game long ago.
Try Conquest Enhanced. It's so much better than Conquest mode right now. However, it can push your PC to the limit in terms of performance.
The game has been out for over a year now and we're still not getting any real improvements to the dynamic campaign. Unfortunately, the game is still pretty much unfinished. Even the expansion appeared unfinished. What drives me crazy is that there are no orders for tanks not to rotate their turrets and just focus on vehicles.
Overall heavy weapons and tanks should have some way to lock a target arc because doing an attack with too many units makes micromanagement difficult.
False.
Improvements in the form of new maps, new units, new weapons, new entrenchments, reworked command structure, more logical research tree, etc, etc. There have been LOTS of improvements to Conquest mode. Maybe just not the ones you wanted.
However, I agree with everything else you stated.