Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
Normas y directrices sobre discusión
Denunciar este mensaje
Cope harder 'murican. Bl2 has less players, clearly inferior game.
Borderlands 3 was just dreadful. The gun play was fine but the story and characters were just terrible.
If you want achievements handed to you (not earned), a disemboweled story, characters forced into importance instead of their own merits, and one-note final boss, with some improved gameplay, just go with BL3.
So do you want to experience why you are going through the game or just care about shiny pew pew that you can turn your brain off to? Both are valid paths to video games, so only you can decide which one you are. (yes BL3 is the shiny pew pew in that comparison)
Many of us are passionate in our views of the "best". Though I do stand by BL2 is the best overall, it does come down to personal preference so if someone likes one of others better (even BL3) that is their right. The issue comes down when one goes around trying to covert everyone to one game like it is their religion. That is where it goes too far.
Leaving the prior points on which is better alone, I do suggest playing BL2 before BL3. That way story and references will not leave you lost.
BL1 and BL The Pre Sequel (bulk of story is between 1 and 2, but is made after 2 so intended to play after it) have their own merits. Personally because of later DLC scrapped, I consider TPS as a big DLC for BL2. As for BL1, it is a solid game but I found it a bit rough and unpolished but it is what started it after all.
You've heard all the views. So whichever sounds better, start there and have fun!
After Galaga, Space Invaders, Pong, Centipede and other classics games started being built with story. Especially after they came to consoles and then PC. This is because people care about why they are doing what they do. Story does matter, for some games more than others depending on the genre.
And claiming 30 years with your wife means you found something to like about it, that is a bunch of crock. Too many people have stayed together because of pressure from family and tradition or religion. So they keep the toxic going because they are too afraid (either from their spouse or their community that runs their lives). So 3 decades doesn't by default mean it is a good marriage. Hope for that person their spouse isn't suffering by being chained to the marriage for those or similar reasons.
Wow your take on games sure devolved into some issues with family and marriage, rofl. Not sure where that came in.
Of course, story matters more to some than others. To me it's irrelevant, which is why I don't really care how woke or whatever a game/story gets. Often times the story is actually a hindrance or annoyance. I just want to enjoy the GAMEPLAY and the game insists on long, obnoxious cut scenes or what-have-you. Or take Tiny Tina's Wonderlands: I had to mute the dialogue because that ♥♥♥♥♥ will not shut up.
Some of the best games being made, arguably, still have little to no story. And if someone wants to focus on gameplay vs story, it's not "turning their brains off", it's merely being more right-brained than left. I want a game to engage my intuitive tactical thinking, awareness, and reflexes, not bog me down with narrative.
And, when the original Borderlands was released, it wasn't the story that attracted anyone to the game. It was the concept - the fact it was the first game of its' kind, and it was insanely fun and well developed.
(Edit for those unaware: when the original Borderlands was released, "open world shooter" or "looter shooter" were not terms in existence, so it was marketed, essentially, as the first "RPG FPS")
It was referenced by the poster before I posted so I touched on all points.
If you had read the prior posts you would have answered your own question on where it came from
I want a game that incorporates both story and gameplay. And if a game has story, I want the sequels to keep it consistent and not destroy the built narrative and characters. Borderlands is both gameplay and story. If BL3 hadn't butchered the story and forced problematic cut scenes then very few of us would have had issues with it, from either left or right brain. If you want pure tactical and such, without story, than doesn't sound like Borderlands is the right series for you.