Εγκατάσταση Steam
Σύνδεση
|
Γλώσσα
简体中文 (Απλοποιημένα κινεζικά)
繁體中文 (Παραδοσιακά κινεζικά)
日本語 (Ιαπωνικά)
한국어 (Κορεατικά)
ไทย (Ταϊλανδικά)
Български (Βουλγαρικά)
Čeština (Τσεχικά)
Dansk (Δανικά)
Deutsch (Γερμανικά)
English (Αγγλικά)
Español – España (Ισπανικά – Ισπανία)
Español – Latinoamérica (Ισπανικά – Λατινική Αμερική)
Français (Γαλλικά)
Italiano (Ιταλικά)
Bahasa Indonesia (Ινδονησιακά)
Magyar (Ουγγρικά)
Nederlands (Ολλανδικά)
Norsk (Νορβηγικά)
Polski (Πολωνικά)
Português (Πορτογαλικά – Πορτογαλία)
Português – Brasil (Πορτογαλικά – Βραζιλία)
Română (Ρουμανικά)
Русский (Ρωσικά)
Suomi (Φινλανδικά)
Svenska (Σουηδικά)
Türkçe (Τουρκικά)
Tiếng Việt (Βιετναμικά)
Українська (Ουκρανικά)
Αναφορά προβλήματος μετάφρασης
well, whatever the negative version of "demon" means, that's what lillith is
that's an interesting question about whether or not our earth is connected to the Borderlands universe, how cool would it be if earth is one of the planets we can visit in BL4? and what would the year be on earth? it could be very cool!
i totally agree, others are acting as if she's a saint and an angel, i have no idea what game they've been playing
as for lillith's mission reward guns sucking, in my mind, she chose them, she went into her bag of junk and gave us her most crap guns, that's how i read the situation
what about the tribal people on eden 6, men and women, living in those huts, those were homes, and we went in completely unprovoked, guns blazing, killing and looting like we always do, lillith and the vault hunters don't kill children because there are no children in sight, the people we attack have probably hidden them away in safe places, because if they didn't, we'd be killing them all, we have no issue killing young men and women, how is that ok? you're acting as if there's a line between killing innocent men and women, and killing innocent children, all of the above are evil, so you can't escape lillith being evil, we were never the good guys, because there are no good guys in borderlands!
as for ratatouille, all i remember about that movie was ratatouille taking a crap in people's soup, biting the chefs scalp and ears, and generally spreading disease, that's what rats do, and that's what ratatouille did, he's gross, and his paws are covered in salmonella, what a loser
nice try, but i feel you're overestimating the damage caused, elpis looked fine in bl2 and bl3, and the close up in bl3 showed that it was perfectly intact, there wasn't even a hint of a crater from any such attack on its surface, tbh it didn't look any more or less inhabitable than in tps, it looked exactly the same
i agree with the latter half of your comment, but the first isn't just bias, lillith gave us objectively crap junk
meanwhile, claptrap gave us things like the pearl of ineffable knowledge, he understands what we need and want
meanwhile, lillith just buys the cheapest junk from the nearest vending machine and gives is out as mission rewards
Correct. The "evil spirit" connotations for "demon" are from Christianity.
Even prior to medieval era, it was written and pronounced as "Daemon" (Latin) or "Daimon" (Greek), and it represented a supernatural being, not an evil one per se. Etymologically daimon is likely a cognate Sankrit "danava" (a race of Asura).
Trivia: Even the concept of "deity" (lesser god) originally comes from Sanskrit proto-Vedic concept of "Daitya", who are the race of Asuras, children of "Diti" who's one of the Mother (primordial) Goddesses in Hindu Pantheon (from her the "Daityas" and "Marutas" were descended). The other Mother Goddesses (in Hindu proto-Vedic pantheon) are Aditi (from whom the divine "Devas/Suras" such as Indra and the 12 Adityas like "Mitra" and "Varuna" were born) and "Danu" (from whom "Danavas", the other race of "Asuras", were born). The Devas/Suras and Asuras are half-brothers.
Trivia: the Celtic/Irish Goddess "Danu" is the same "Danu" of Hindu origin (she's considered the primordial water/river goddess), and several the rivers in Europe are named after "Danu" (such as Danube, Dniestr, Dnieper, etc.).
Trivia: The Avestan/Zoroastrian concept are derived from the proto-Vedic pantheon, and hence they revere Ahuras (~Asuras) as good divine beings and consider Daevas (~Devas) as evil (this is opposite to Vedic concepts of Devas as diving beings and Asuras as belligerent/evil beings). Hence their holy book is Ahura Mazda. The Zoroastric fled from the persecutions of the Persian wars, back to their home land of India/Bharat, and they call themself Parsis (original Persians) since then. They are respected minority community in India who have given India several industry leaders (business empires) and societal stalwarts.
Trivia; the Aesir (Æsir) in Norse/Viking/Scandinavian/Lithuanian pantheon are derived from Hindu Asura, while the other race of Vanir are derived from Hindu Vanara. Famous Aesir/Æsir include Odin, Thor, Frigg (Odin's wife), Thor, Heimdall (guardian of the Asgardian bridge), Loki (the trickster, ex of Jötunn the Frost Giants), Njord (the sea god, ex-Vanir) Tyr (god of war), Freyr (god of fertility, ex-Vanir) & Freya (goddess of fertility), Sif (Thor's wife). The Ašvieniai/Asvinnae of the Norse pantheon (famously visible as the twin horse-heads wooden emblem on Viking longhouses and traditional Lithuanian houses) is derived from the Ashvin twins (horse-gods) from Hindu pantheon, sons of the Sun god Surya (Savitr). In fact, the Viking/Lithuanian word for horse (ašva) is derived from the Sanskrit word for horse (ashva). It is no coincidence that many words in Lithuanian language are similar to classic Sanskrit language script. Sanskrit word for fire (agni) became Agnis/Ignis in Lithuanian/Nordic languages, Sankrit Deva became Nordic/Lithuanian Daeva, Asura became Aesir, Vanara became Vanir, etc.. the list of such ancient influences is almost endless.
Trivia: Why these obscure similarities though between India and European cultures? It's because Sanskrit and Tamil are world's oldest active languages (and so the proto-Vedic Indian culture spread outwards), and India has been populated since before the last Ice Age meltdown! In fact, scientists confirmed that the Singhbhum landmass (Indian subcontinent landmass) was the first landmass to arise from the last Ice Age meltdown, and this is why the Himalayas (especially Mount Everest) are the tallest mountains in the world - it's because they rose up first from the ice cold oceans, before other mountain ranges in the world. During British Raj in India, when the Britishers tried to figure out why the sacred Ganges/Ganga river waters never got spoilt (such was this fame, that British ordered only Ganga water to be stored on ships as drinking/washing water, because it didn't used to get spoilt during the long sea voyages), and why Indians considered Ganga waters to be so holy because it supposedly cured all illness/ailments, they found something incredible - the Ganga river was the meltdown of an ancient ocean in the Himalayas, and it had ancient bacteriophages (this was first discovery of bacteriophages as per modern science) that killed bacteria, and thus prevented the water from being spoilt and help to cure some ailments. It was practically the healthiest water in the world, thanks to an ancient ocean on top of the oldest tallest mountains (Himalayas) in the world!
Trivia: The computer term "daemon" (background program/service) is from Maxwell's daemon of physics and thermodynamics, but another IT legend says it is an abbreviation for Disk And Executive MONitor.
https://ei.cs.vt.edu/~history/Daemon.html
https://www.reddit.com/r/etymology/comments/120ig8k/the_origin_of_the_word_daemon/
TLDR: it is foolish to think that "demon" means innately evil. It is a religious corruption in recent centuries, as its earlier connotation is "supernatural/celestial being". In Hinduism, even Asuras (Daityas and Danavas) are not considered evil per se, they are considered to be supernatural beings (half brothers of the Devas/gods, who themselves do not always behave in a divine or benevolent way; this demonstrates that goodness and evil are not innate traits but rather temporary behaviour based on social moulding and circumstances) who've strayed from their divine origins (as children of Mother Goddesses). There have been Asura kings like Mahabali who are still worshipped as gods in India because of their divine benevolence and incredible achievements (e.g., Mahabali conquered the TriLokas (3 worlds: Swargaloka/Heaven, Patalaloka/Hell, Bhuloka/Earth) but surrendered them when god Vishnu appeared in front of him as an ascetic dwarf (Vamana avatar)), while there are gods who have fallen out of favour for worship (e.g., Mitra, the god of light and Danu the Mother Goddess are almost forgotten in Hinduism these days, while they are still in favour in Persian/Iranian/Turkish cultures and Celtic/Irish culture respectively).
i mean, when you first get to sanctuary, claptrap has people imprisioned in what will soon become your room on the idea that he thinks they are more valuable as slaves.
an extension of this is how he tells all sorts of lies about his adventures and makes himself out to be the heroe when he never does anything contructive and then Ava comes on board and believes all of claptraps tall tales and thinks he's the coolest, so it's again the writers signaling to us that we aren't supposed to like Ava. .
but then i dunno, because then they try to make you feel sorry for the claptrap the whole game you're finding parts for his girlfriend and when you finally finish her, she leaves him. and then they make him sympathetic where he has some noble things he does at least twice aaand crap. .i literally forgot the first one , but the second one was way late in the story, there is a side quest to go dancing with someone and it turns out this person got injured and now lives in a wheelchair and she's all depressed, but claptrap cheers her up and teaches her that having wheels instead of legs isn't all bad and actually, i don't know why they put that quest in there, because it's so short and has no relevance to the story, but i guess it's kind of cute.
and then there's the scraptraps in the handsome jack DLC and you get to kill them all and the NPC even says "you asked for this" (as if to break the 4th wall, meaning you, as the players asked for the chhance to kill claptrap so here, here's 100 claptraps for you to murder AND a giant one as well!) but then later, the Scrapstructor makes a "heroic sacrifice" , not unlike lilith, but on a much smaller scale and then you are made to feel sorry for it because it's still alive and stuck there and complains about loneliness.
and given that we've been all sharing our Game Theories and then the mention of Ratatoullie. i'm reminded of Matpat and his theory that the Ratatoulle rat is not as "clean" as we think he is. . .
but hey, it's just a Theory, A Gam. . .
nevermind
He didn't do that to anybody's soup. He improved the big pot of soup because it didn't smell right to his highly developed nose. And it came out wonderful.
Though Remy is very intelligent and can understand the human language (at least for where he lives), he cannot speak it. So they were trying to figure out a system for him to communicate cooking instructions. Once they figured out the weird marionette connections, it was golden.
He is a cartoon rat that practices good hygiene and is very selective about what he eats. So he doesn't have disease and such, though that is all most people see upon seeing a rat.
He cooks good clean food, stopped his colony from stealing to survive, got them to appreciate the food along with being clean, helped the critic regain his humanity, and is a big part in a new successful restaurant. He is neither gross or a loser. Sounds like you either didn't watch it at all (just snippets or trailers at best), or you didn't pay attention and let your pre-conceived bias ruin the movie.
I am wondering if for you to enjoy something (game or movie) it has to be deep and dark while being a parallel to real-life with no fantasy elements. It comes off that you discount the fantasy/fiction elements of many of them.
its like b3 writers are pondering what to do to make tyreen do the ultimate bbeg finale act as b3 ending, and suddenly they remembered b1.5 elpis is still hovering on pandora doing nothing... then they just decide to have tyreen drop elpis, with lilith's method of stopping its descent be complete afterthought they just wrote in since they're more concerned about how to rush the job and what 'unnecessary contents' to cut. so enough ocd about elpis and lilith killing elpis children with glee to go out as a 'hero' because the writers didn't bother to make a somewhat sensical b3 ending. why should we bother ocd-ing and correcting the writers laziness here regarding b3 ending when we can't even sure whether they want lilith in that scene to stop elpis to be painted as hero, fallen anti-hero, monster or whatever else?
b3 writers had written themselves to a very confusing labyrinth full of plot holers in every corners. i really wonder how b4 writers would continue writing the borderlands story and characters after the failtastic holey writing of b3. b4 writers would probably set the new b4 story in a very far in the future setting, so that they could safely start their own new and 'completely fresh' borderlands stories without the hideous writing flaws of b3 haunting them, with them easily writing all the og borderlands characters be just footnotes in history with most of them already long dead due to old age or something. but they'd probably won't do that, since the way b3 writers write ava into every b3 cliffhangers had already indirectly forced b4 writers to completely focus on ava's next storeh on her journey to become the suest of mary sue.
also, while ilith does gave out bad guns as rewards, her flame of the firehawk shield quest reward in b2 is one of the best shield for certain gaige and krieg builds.
about claptrap. he likes to break 4th walls. so don't think too hard about what he does. because he's like the paimon of genshin impact in borderlands, he can do whatever he wants and he'll always have the plot armor to survive anything the writers threw at him. though i'm already long sick of gearbox's long tradition of making jokes about 'kicking claptrap while he's down' thing. its basically forced ingraining of bullying and hazing claptrap to almost every borderlands characters, with few exceptions to that trend like ava and maybe gaige. gaige politely and reluctantly asking claptrap's help in glt is probably one of the very few scene where b3 writers accidentally do a good writing for both gaige and claptrap's character (i'd still won't touch glt and won't consider it canon though because they nerfed almost every aspect of gaige's character and have her be simping hard for hammerlock). both gaige and claptrap are dorky weird characters that had shared backgrounds as victims of serious prolonged bullying. i was really disappointed anthony and other b2 writers never try to explore the potentially close friendship between gaige and claptrap. having a b3 quest where gaige tries to defend claptrap's another mishap while claptrap proceeds to do another claptrap thing that both endanger and embarrass them both would be so amusing.