安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
Requiring always onine?
I mean, in the grand scheme of DRM, this is really minor. :)
It doesn't even hold a candle to SecuROM, or say, Starforce, which destroyed CD/DVD drives.
It's basically not any different than Steam.
I mean, yeah, Borderlands 2 had the option to disable online, and play offline.
But this is essentially doing the same thing World of Warcraft does.
If I am wrong, please point out to me, what the DRM does, because all I can tell is it literally just acts like an MMO.
So far, the only argument I've heard against it is: "it's our right as consumer". I've yet to hear a single argument regarding how anyone will be seriously inconvenienced by it. This is why I feel this shouldn't be such a big deal, because everyone has failed to demonstrate it should be.
Except Battleborn isn't an MMO your conflating it as such and incessent responses to every post in this thread reciting it makes you appear as either a shill or incompetent.
Exactly so always online is an added unneeded requirement - a layer of extra DRM. Good job undermining your own position.
----------------------------------------------------------
Some people are not as blatantly ignorant of the history of these decisions:
Nor the history of other multiplayer focused games that never added unneeded always online requirements: Unreal Tournament, Tribes, Battlefront, Left for Dead 2 etc.
Further it's not us that are against added needless requirements that have to pose any argument. The argument is self-evident.
Rather it's you that needs to explain why a useless requirement should be added - but most people have the common sense not to board a sinking ship.
Being rude and trolling destroys your credibility.
I'm not shilling for a game I have only slight interest in playing, that is terribl logic, and you should feel bad.
Anyhow, online DRM is how it is for a lot of games, I'm sorry, but not all those games are evil, and not all those companies are evil.
And as far as the argument being self-evident... I'm still not seeing what the fuss is all about beyond "fighting for our rights!". In this day an age, pretty much everything requires an online connection. It's just the way the gaming industry is evolving. You have every right not to like it, you can boycott always online games if you like, but plastering game forums with propaganda and talking down to the community like they're the mindless drones of an evil corporate entity seems like a little much to me.
I'm just your average gamer looking forward to a game's release, no more, no less.
Is a Online Only great? No, it is not. Is it better than the game being a joke were everyone with the best gear is either a hacker or a friend of a hacker? Yes, remarkably so.
Sometimes you gotta choose between the lesser of two evils; and one of those evils is gamebreaking; the other one of those evils is offered free at McDonalds.
While Im not going to complain for this game cause I think many of the reasons are valid to keep some of the character componets server side, it certainly isnt needed in every game.
Corrected.
If you don't play online, I would recommend sticking to single-player games. Battleborn is primarily a multiplayer game with single-player as an option, not the other way around. I'm sure you can still get some quality platyime doing nothing but solo PvE missions, but if the occasionnal maintenance is such a dealbreaker for you, then maybe it's time to accept the fact that this game isn't for you.