Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Thats just the thing Poot, AMD didnt make a stride these last couple years, they made a leap. Intel is getting griefed because of their slacking off. The i5-9600k for instance struggles to get more than a 5% increase in comparison to the 8600k in gaming. Thats a completely new series gaining almost nothing and costing more. Not to mention Intel still makes you pay for that K, where AMD still doesnt. Then theres sockets and futureproofing, but w/e. Intel put themselves in the position they are in now, we stand to gain from it as the consumer which I'm all for.
Example:
Ryzen 2700x base clock is at 4ghz on 8 cores 16 threads.
i7-8700 has 4.2ghz 6 cores and 12 threads.
So difference is minimal - you will never feel the difference of 200mhz.
Whenever you play a game that is optimised for multi core usage, the Ryzen will be ahead.
Now you got to think of the costs in terms of performance.
Is it worth to pay 100 - 200 more bucks just to get a raw boost on paper of maybe 5%?
AMD actually has come up with very good CPU's for fair prices that can handle games as good as intel does. And believe me I'm in love with intel since I switched from my old phenom x to an i i5 4690k. But if I had to buy me a new system today, I'd go with the Ryzen 2700x. And yes I run multiple apps at once and I am streaming sometimes, so it's a better choice for me. But even if you only play games and need raw gaming performance, isn't it always nice to know that you have something in backup? I mean maybe you're not streaming games today but what if you'll do so in the future? What if the game is getting an update for better multicore usage in the future? Other games that are coming out in the future might make use of multiple cores...
I won't make a decision for you, nobody can do that for you. You just have to think about what you get back for your money.
#edit - oh well now I've noticed to late that you already made a choice...
So for Squad the i7 would be about 17% better if you are CPU bound and not GPU bound.
Sorry but the old i5s has seen their day, new games will utilize hyperthreading, and they dont offer it...
The i7 series are the kings of gaming CPUs. Undisputed now.
ipc is not only the base clock its the architecture.
Probably listen to this guy. I'm living in the past LOL.
I got a 970 g1 and it's incredible hard to figure out what GPU to upgrade to.
I don't want a 1080 cause they will be outdated soon, I don't want a 2080 because they are well overpriced and not that far from a 1080.
Can get a 2070 but do I really want to have another 70 card?
Help me god.
God said, sell my pc and buy a sword.
Overclocking is so easy with the new motherboards, and it's fun to tweak around.
I should think so as well I have had mine,, 3-4 years ?
But,, and it does, still run virtually everything out there at the moment at 1080 either maxed or very close with a 970, still !
In no way am I complaining in real terms this is the best setup I have ever had in gaming computing and my first one was a Intel 286 so that should give you some idea how many cpu/gpu setups I have seen over the years.