Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
RTX 3090 / i9 9900k runs 12gb VRAM in game at 4K with maxed epic and cinematic settings. 89-112 fps in Fallujah.
Ahh so you get a slight competitive edge kinda thing? I mean I was one of the better insurgency players worldwide and I played most of my time on a GT540m barely scraping 60FPS at the best of times. Perhaps that is more specific to the actual style of shooter though. Are you suggesting more twitching shooter like CS:GO Apex etc?
Again top hardware, not even 144FPS.
Ah ok yea.... I was playing Insurgency Sandstorm with my laptop + 27'monitor with 90-120 FPS and I was a kind of beast, but worldwide...
I mean of course we can't compare Squad to CS but to be honest every drop along with poor AA implementation makes you lose gunfights all the time. That's really bad like for the shooter.
Correct. Thankfully I'm limited to a 55' 4K 60hz LOL - let's hope the NEW game is sick with optimization.
Which new game are we talking about?