Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
RTX 3090 / i9 9900k runs 12gb VRAM in game at 4K with maxed epic and cinematic settings. 89-112 fps in Fallujah.
Ahh so you get a slight competitive edge kinda thing? I mean I was one of the better insurgency players worldwide and I played most of my time on a GT540m barely scraping 60FPS at the best of times. Perhaps that is more specific to the actual style of shooter though. Are you suggesting more twitching shooter like CS:GO Apex etc?
Again top hardware, not even 144FPS.
Ah ok yea.... I was playing Insurgency Sandstorm with my laptop + 27'monitor with 90-120 FPS and I was a kind of beast, but worldwide...
I mean of course we can't compare Squad to CS but to be honest every drop along with poor AA implementation makes you lose gunfights all the time. That's really bad like for the shooter.
Correct. Thankfully I'm limited to a 55' 4K 60hz LOL - let's hope the NEW game is sick with optimization.
Which new game are we talking about?