安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I really want to know more about those "many similiar games" you played. Can you name a few?
Large scale military themed multiplayer first-person shooters with 64+ player servers and vehicles where you capture objectives until you run out of tickets have been around for like 20 years. Best examples being the entire Battlefield series and the Joint Operations: Typhoon Rising game from years back.
Military themed games are a dime a dozen and would be silly to try to list all of those I have played. Large scale MMOFPS games are a bit rarer but have been around since Battlefield 1942. If you expand the scope into other similar genres you have games like Battlefront II and Unreal Tournament 3, games where you compete between two teams to capture relay points and then assault and capture the main base with vehicles, etc. This is the general gameplay of games like Planetside 2 as well.
Obviously this game is trying to be more like a modern military sim but the general gameplay of "pick a class, choose a spawn point, jump into vehicle, drive to flag, kill enemies, take over flag, move to next flag) is not novel or new in the least bit.
That being said this game may be one of the best in its genre but its nothing that I haven't seen before so I wouldn't know.
There are only a handful of other games that are comparable to Sqaud, namely Hell Let loose, Verdun, Post Scriptum and Beyond the Wire. Even large scales military shooters are pretty rare, there is only Battlefield these days.
Anyway, considering the fact that you think, or expect the game to be ""pick a class, choose a spawn point, jump into vehicle, drive to flag, kill enemies, take over flag, move to next flag) ." shows that this game and the likes are definitely not for you. It is actually something you have not seen before. It is pretty niche and not many coming from other more casual games do not like it and find it boring.
To be honest, if you're just looking at this game as "a modern military shooter", your conception of gaming as a whole is pretty shallow. Hell Let Loose and Battlefield V are both "World War 2 multiplayer shooters" but they could not be more different from each other. I hated what I played of Battlefield V but I enjoyed most of what I played in Hell Let Loose. Gameplay-wise, they are completely different despite both being World War 2 themed, team-based, high player count, multiplayer FPS games. Sometimes you have to look beyond the superficial similarities.
I've yet to play a game that provided all of those attributes as effective as the earlier versions of this game embraced.
The developers have since focused primarily on adding more content as the most vocal members of the community tend to cry about content while also being less appreciative of what makes games appealing, which is gameplay.
This would be a weird time to start playing this game, as it's essentially no longer "Squad" but more of more punishing BF with some player-built defenses and bigger maps thrown in "BF:Authentic".
Unfortunately you did in fact miss something big. It was called v9 and OPFL.
It doesn’t, they’re apples and oranges.
It'd help also if you list specs.
Plus clearing your cache helps alot for performance.
The draw is the RTS stuff along with the camaraderie you can have with your Squad.
RTS as in, having the resource management, along with the control over were you build stuff. Not just were your teams Spawns, but being able to build defenses and whatnot.
The game is almost a FPS/RTS hybrid.
This is a big plus for me too. Having players work so closely together to achieve (often complex) objectives gives a good sense of camaraderie. That and the community is very good in my opinion. I'd heard bad things about Squad - that the players were unwelcoming and unfriendly, but that was not my experience at all. From the first round I ever played until now, the community was the exact opposite of what I expected. Most people are more than willing to lend a hand to new players and the community does not take itself too seriously. It's an eclectic mix of players from goofy guys, eccentric military nuts, women (who almost exclusively play medic in my experience), children, Arabs, Russians, Israelis, Euros (both East and West), Americans and probably Martians too.
When you remove the pretentious elitism you realize that a ton of games have the exact same gameplay loop just with different presentations and audiences. Sorry that isn't obvious to you.
I also didn't buy the game. I got it as part of Humble Bundle from 2019.