Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
What happens in the real world and why it happens is not the same as fiction. Context, it doesn't look good within the context of fiction. The sport of war is simple. Surrender or die opposing. If you don't surrender you're at the opposition's mercy. Whatever it takes to remove the opposition and take their ground. Don't hope they have time to feel sorry for you, because they don't and won't. Choose to surrender of face the consequences.
People think warfare is righteous and magical. It's not, it's just dirty work made into a sport. BUT they must show the world how superior they are. They would never execute someone that would do the same to them, because they are so MUCH BETTER!
So how do you depict executing enemy personnel and not look like a homicidal psychopath? The business of killing is supposed to be nice, fair, noble and sophisticated.
Meaning, if a person is revived and downed again within 60 seconds of being revived, they're back to the respawn screen.
It was removed for improvement 2 years ago, and is finally returning.
I 100% agree or maybe if you get shot in the head off the bat that should be a non revive scenario
The team that attrits the other team more effectively wins, is the simplest way I see it. Denying supplies, movement, vehicles etc.
A enemy damaged heavy vehicle (not destroyed) with a dead crew means that vehicle is effectively asset denied, until the crew is able to get back and repair. A destroyed vehicle or truck on a single track bridge or rail line is also effective as it slows enemy resupply by redirecting traffic to slower/covered routes.
Not just vehicles. Infantry squads might very well get wiped out down to the last man, and yes they might very well revive right back up to full manpower in the space of a few minutes. But after that the damage is done, the enemy squad has been slowed down and reduced in supply unless someone in the squad has an ammo pack (wouldn't that be something eh) or until they return to resupp at a base of fob.
How time flies.
Yes, possibly. But I'm not sure how much this entered into the dev's decision making. I mean, the game already features the ability to mow down medics while they are treating the wounded. There are many things that already make this game look very violent/cruel/"bad impressions" in the eyes of those that want to be outraged. In my opinion, the people who would understand the difference between shooting wounded enemies "dead dead" vs. shooting medics reviving people are not the type of people to get upset by it. To most this is just a violent war game, while to those of us that play war games, it is just a game.
But you shouldn't be able to be revived from explosive concussions or large calibers.
IRL a concussion will obliterate your organs from the inside, and a 50 caliber will evacuate your chest cavity or completely remove limbs.