Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
Who would you see as the primary opposition to a PMC?
as for game modes, insurgency would make sense although since it doesn't seem to be played very much invasion would be the next best thing. i would say a new game mode where the PMCs escort something from one point to another but i don't see it fitting in with the rest of the game as it would probably have much shorter matches. unless there has to be several trips made turning it into more of a supply line defence game.
Definitely the Unconventional Forces.
A INS/Militia With PMCs defending would be really fun.
What if instead of MBTs and APCs, the PMC get little bird helos with mini guns or rocket pods?
I think that could make an interesting assymetrical balance to factions with heavy armor.
They would be a sort of light air assault focused faction.
This would be a fun idea to try. Conventional forces have to deliver X units of victory supplies unusable as regular build or ammo to a radio/radios on the edge of the map, within a certain amount of time or with a certain amount of tickets. MIL/INS get extra spawn points. I feel like in practice though this game mode might actually be extremely unbalanced and frustrating. >.>