商店页面
Squad
全部 讨论 截图 艺术作品 实况直播 视频 创意工坊 新闻 指南 评测
Squad > Game Owner Discussion > 主题详情
kalashDEM 2019 年 8 月 1 日 上午 9:15
Bipod on the Dragunov SVDm
Hello,

Why does the Russian SVDm have no bipod?
Is there a specific reason for that? My opinion ia that it should have one :)

Cheers
< >
正在显示第 1 - 5 条，共 5 条留言
NickySins 2019 年 8 月 1 日 上午 10:18 
It's already pretty good and it looks horrible on it.
#1
Kyd Quzine 2019 年 8 月 1 日 下午 12:52 
yeah looks > function. u might get rekt by US and GB snipers at 500m but atleast your gun looks streamline
#2
Seven 2019 年 8 月 1 日 下午 1:02 
引用自 Spurs 剣聖：
It's already pretty good and it looks horrible on it.
Pretty good is not good enough when you're outclassed by the other marksmen.


引用自 Kyd Quzine：
yeah looks > function. u might get rekt by US and GB snipers at 500m but atleast your gun looks streamline
What is this sarcasm.
#3
NickySins 2019 年 8 月 1 日 下午 1:06 
bipod is overrated, real men use their arms as bipods.
#4
Bo Cardwell 2019 年 8 月 2 日 上午 10:07 
Pretty good is an understatement. Outside of the meme rifle given to the CAF (I don't know the damage value), it has one of highest damage values in the game for an infantry weapon, to the point where a body shot at full health needs to be attended to VERY quickly, or you bleed out. Less than full is very likely to get one tapped.

I still and will stand behind my statement that none of the marksmen rifles should have been given bipods, unless infantry in general can rest their primary weapons on the surface of an object.
#5
< >
正在显示第 1 - 5 条，共 5 条留言
每页显示数： 1530 50

Squad > Game Owner Discussion > 主题详情
发帖日期： 2019 年 8 月 1 日 上午 9:15
回复数： 5

讨论规则及指引