Here's something new Full Auto Vs Semi Auto

[Grant]

Is it hard to use Semi auto In CQB
Will I have a chance to take the bad guy down if hes using Full auto and i'm using semi in CQB
Or is it really hard to in squad?

PS I love shooting in semi because it's better control then full

[Nano]

What exactly is your question?

[TapTwo]

Private First Class E-3 の投稿を引用：

I like to shoot in semi auto in (FFS) games..... Is it a must to shoot in Full auto on this game? I hear alot of people on youtube saying shoot in full. Yes I clear rooms in semi and do a lot of CQB in semi auto. In Squad can I still get the enemy down with his full auto vs my semi? His Weapon aim at me Mine aimed at him will he get me down because he's using full auto please tell me I have a chance to kill him without during a dirty move like killing him while hes not looking

I prefer using single select fire in CQB Auto depending on what you are using can throw you off. Fast click single is the way to go

[Grant]

Nano の投稿を引用：

What exactly is your question?

Let me make it short... Will it be a unfair fight in CQB if i use semi auto.... Me (Semi) Vs him (Full Auto)

[Guunter Dawg]

Your glyph is kinda hard to cipher, but I'll try to answer my best.

It is a must to engage the enemy in full auto. It is very risky move to take semi-auto in close quarter combat.

When one person fires in full while one fires semi "at each other", the chances are the person who fires the most bullet per second lives. Though one bullet to the head will definitely take an enemy down, again that move is very risky and not recommended. Think of it like a soldier's perspective, don't take unnecessary risk that will lead to a squad's demise.

I fully suggest to go full auto at close range when facing contacts. Semi and full auto is recommended in long range combat depending how hot the firefight is.

[Grant]

TapTwo の投稿を引用：

Private First Class E-3 の投稿を引用：

I like to shoot in semi auto in (FFS) games..... Is it a must to shoot in Full auto on this game? I hear alot of people on youtube saying shoot in full. Yes I clear rooms in semi and do a lot of CQB in semi auto. In Squad can I still get the enemy down with his full auto vs my semi? His Weapon aim at me Mine aimed at him will he get me down because he's using full auto please tell me I have a chance to kill him without during a dirty move like killing him while hes not looking

I prefer using single select fire in CQB Auto depending on what you are using can throw you off. Fast click single is the way to go

Thank I though I was the only one... Could I add you and we play sometime (The 15th)

[Hash]

Private First Class E-3 の投稿を引用：

TapTwo の投稿を引用：

I prefer using single select fire in CQB Auto depending on what you are using can throw you off. Fast click single is the way to go

Thank I though I was the only one... Could I add you and we play sometime (The 15th)

Using Single fire in CQB wouldnt be recommended, theres a reason military\rifle tech moved forward to full auto's, using single shot for everything is very "gamey" imo.

Even when distances open up, auto shouldnt be discarded automatically, it depends on situation In a realistic shooter like this , its as important to get "lead down range" as it is picking away like a marksman, espcilly if you are the fire element (suppression), leave marksmen shooting to the "marksmen",

I personally get a little anoyed when operating as a squad at times,as you could have 1 guy suppressing while 8 other guys want to be "snipers"\marksmen, like all the ego shooters want you to be.

Theres nothing greater in game,then having a full squad lined on ridge, unloading in enemys genral direction, its all about unleashing hate, get there heads down, then maneuver your assault element to finish em up close with FULL AUTO, HURRAH

"FIRE YOUR ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ GUN SON!!" instead of trying to "get kills" like a noob.

[LION]

I run every single weapon on semi auto, rarely do I ever use full auto and I have absolutly no trouble putting the hurt on guys at any range but it really comes down to play style mostly I suppose.

[Hash]

Lion の投稿を引用：

I run every single weapon on semi auto, rarely do I ever use full auto and I have absolutly no trouble putting the hurt on guys at any range but it really comes down to play style mostly I suppose.

IRL life with a little M4 "pea shooter" (5.56) id want\need damn near a full mag to ensure the bad guys go down in CQB.

[TapTwo]

Hash の投稿を引用：

Private First Class E-3 の投稿を引用：

Thank I though I was the only one... Could I add you and we play sometime (The 15th)

Using Single fire in CQB wouldnt be recommended, theres a reason military\rifle tech moved forward to full auto's, using single shot for everything is very "gamey" imo.

Even when distances open up, auto shouldnt be discarded automatically, it depends on situation In a realistic shooter like this , its as important to get "lead down range" as it is picking away like a marksman, espcilly if you are the fire element (suppression), leave marksmen shooting to the "marksmen",

I personally get a little anoyed when operating as a squad at times,as you could have 1 guy suppressing while 8 other guys want to be "snipers"\marksmen, like all the ego shooters want you to be.

Theres nothing greater in game,then having a full squad lined on ridge, unloading in enemys genral direction, its all about unleashing hate, get there heads down, then maneuver your assault element to finish em up close with FULL AUTO, HURRAH

"FIRE YOUR ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ GUN SON!!" instead of trying to "get kills" like a noob.

We in the military rarely used full auto/burst in CQB wasting all your rounds on non controlled shots means that you leave yourself vunerable when facing multiple enemies up close. There is little reason to go full auto when proper single fire gets the job done more efficiently. The Military moved to burst not full auto for a good reason its more controllable and even then they recommend the use of single fire.

[Hash]

Id still use full auto, in split sec circumstances,full auto doesnt mean you have to hold on to trigger ,IRL id rely on a weighted trigger if possible for single shots, giving me best of both worlds, full auto option should not be disregarded despite western armys around the world displaying far more trigger discipline then their forefathers, when it comes to killing a human beyond all doubt and winning fire superiority (especially in CQB with small over penetrating rounds) then full auto is the option.

Intresting article, about SWAT application however alot of downsides wouldnt apply to army..
http://www.lawofficer.com/articles/print/volume-10/issue-7/full-auto/semi-vs-full-auto-weapons.html

But saying all that, in "game", its very easy to shoot single,on full auto anyway, so like the weighted trigger option anyway, also one of the major drawbacks of full auto is ammo, which isnt really a major concern (yet) in game.

Also the burst "option" is very controversial with some saying its just outright not used in any circumstances and call for its removal, infact pretty sure the British army doesnt even have burst select.

[SSIXS]

In SQUAD, I believe it depends on your role in the squad and the situation.

If you're the automatic rifleman with the SAW or other MG type weapon and the enemy comes rushing the immediate vicinity of your squad...you better be laying down covering fire in bursts or full auto, instead of trying to plink the enemy in the head in semi-auto. lol

[Grant]

SSIXS の投稿を引用：

In SQUAD, I believe it depends on your role in the squad and the situation.

If you're the automatic rifleman with the SAW or other MG type weapon and the enemy comes rushing the immediate vicinity of your squad...you better be laying down covering fire in bursts or full auto, instead of trying to plink the enemy in the head in semi-auto. lol

A Mg don't have semi sadly

[omL]

Hash の投稿を引用：

Using Single fire in CQB wouldnt be recommended, theres a reason military\rifle tech moved forward to full auto's, using single shot for everything is very "gamey" imo.

Man, you don't know what the hell you're talking about. Haven't seen a military that ever encourage full auto in CQB.

[Leadedcrayon]

omL の投稿を引用：

Hash の投稿を引用：

Using Single fire in CQB wouldnt be recommended, theres a reason military\rifle tech moved forward to full auto's, using single shot for everything is very "gamey" imo.

Man, you don't know what the hell you're talking about. Haven't seen a military that ever encourage full auto in CQB.

You must not of heard of the Soviet Union and their Ppsh but in modern day full auto is just there on rifles for when the machine gunner is down or out of position and heavy suppression is needed.

[Hash]

omL の投稿を引用：

Hash の投稿を引用：

Using Single fire in CQB wouldnt be recommended, theres a reason military\rifle tech moved forward to full auto's, using single shot for everything is very "gamey" imo.

Man, you don't know what the hell you're talking about. Haven't seen a military that ever encourage full auto in CQB.

Depending on weapon and trigger used, a rifle/SMG in full auto can then be used in "burst" hence why the "burst" setting on auto guns never took off,more times than not you need more than one shot on target,espcially in modern combat, the amount of personal armour avaible has made "full auto" more relevant than ever, you also cant train every soldier as a SF operator that has the trigger speed of clint eastwood, standard soldiers in CQB are not SWAT operators.