Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You can disable the DLCs and Addons you don't like.
what the f......?
Sorry, but no. I am aware that it is on sale. That is why I am here.
If there are indeed DLCs that ruin / break the game I will not pretend like they don't exist and reward such sloppy creative behavior by paying an excess for a product, just because I can "disable it" (the broken DLC).
Look at it this way.
Lets say you have a favorite payed (very quality well put together) magazine subscription that you look forward to.
One week you open your door to see the author taking a giant dump where your magazine should be, laughing at you, and instead of acting like an adult / being upset or cancelling your subscription, you bend down to revel in its smell, hand the author money, then shove your face into it.....
Yeah, thanks but no thanks.
The first two larger DLCs, "Vaulters" and "Supremacy", are both widely well-regarded, but "Penumbra" and "Awakening" are less well-received ("Dark Matter" is fine but isn't of the same scale).
Penumbra adds Hacking and the Umbral Choir; both are actually quite interesting, imo, BUT the UC is extremely strong, causing potential balance issues (especially for multiplayer) and Hacking basically changes the entire flow of gameplay a good bit, as well as simply slowing everything down. This isn't necessarily "bad," per se, but it does change the "flavor" of the game, so YMMV.
Awakening adds the Nakalim and the Academy as an active player in galactic politics. The Nakalim are very interesting, actually, and their lore is imo quite well done, but the Academy, especially the bidding for the Academy Fleet, TOTALLY unbalances the game, It's sad, cuz again, the Nakalim are definitely fun (and difficult!) to play.
Personally, I *occasionally* play with Penumbra active, although generally not as the UC; I use them as an "Endgame Crisis", a la Stellaris, if you will. But I don't bother with Awakening often at all. That said, the definitive edition is ca. $22.30 right now, so not using one or more DLCs really isn't a big deal *shrug*. Even if you use just the 1st two big DLCs and the base game, it's quite good; I'd say it's worth $22.30 ^^' .
Ah, good to know.
Thanks for all the info
If you are interested in the game, buy it and play it yourself. The DLCs are a matter of taste, some people like the hacking DLC, others don't.
Try it yourself, don't let others tell you what you like or don't like, because no one knows except yourself (if you buy it), and if you hate it, it is still $7 lousy bucks for the whole thing. The base game alone is worth that, and more.
I mean, you are getting the WHOLE thing, but anyways :)
Edit: I went and checked, if you do a endless space 2 search the Definitive Edition shows as you say, $20+, but if you actually click on the bundle thing itself, the price goes down to around $7. Weird stuff.
Why don't I buy the DLCs I don't have for those lousy $7? Thinking about it, but the thing is adding more layers of complexity doesn't fix the poor designed AI, so once I understood that by getting better at the game, I feel it adds little to no value, but that's my take, other people have their own. If I never played the game, I would buy it. The time it gets to understand the game's shortcomings is worth the reduced price.
The devs could have really invested time and money understanding the different mechanics, what matters more and what less, and apply that to a robust AI, but they chose not to. Instead they made Humankind, and probably repeated the same mistakes because they didn't take the time to understand what's needed from an AI point of view.