Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Maybe not on your little baby monitor.
I would imagine it is super hard to make actual ship designs that are easy to see in the map.
Still agree 100% tho and would be super cool if they could make it work.
I prefer the performance gain rather than tiny ships i can barely see. That's what ship viewer and battle screens are for.
Its not lazy, its a style and it fits the game.
To have all those different ships on the map without having all but the most modern of gaming riggs slowing down to a crawl while zoomed out, the devs would have to make either really low-poly version of those (or outright 2D billboards) that look awful when zoomed in, or various (about 3 or 4) LOD versions of... well, like 7 or 8 ships per faction.
Instead they went with this pretty stylistic and easy-to-implement choice that actually fits the rest of the visuals on the map quite nicely.
And if their graphics departement has the option to either create nice looking visuals that everyone gets to see (like those gorgeous colonization videos... they really blow the remade MoO out of the park here :-) ) or instead make something minor that only really adds to the game if you zoom way in, have a good enough graphics card to show dozens of those ships and needs quite some time from the programming team as well... yeah, it's obvious what the better business idea is.