Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
there's a wiki community[yumenikki.wikia.com] here if that counts
gaster is inspired by uboa from this game
Yume nikki wasn't scary.
You want scary? Go back and Play Dark Seed, or watch John Carpenter's the Thing.
i don't find those remotely scary, personally. i like psychological horror like silent hill 2 and the shining & david lynch films
the scariest stuff in yume nikki is also the most obscure, which adds another layer of creepiness like you were never supposed to find this stuff in the first place. the game deliberately feels like it's hiding a dark secret from you, which obviously inspired the creepy gaster stuff.
The thing was a psychological horror, so was Dark Seed. It kept you guessing at who, or what, was going to die next.
for Dark seed, there was plenty of mystery behind the aliens.
If you want a personally good experience, though, I have no mouth, and I must scream.
For me, Yume nikki was trying WAY too hard to be creepy. It's got to be a light touch, or a gentle pat to make it right. For me, things like this do it better. Then again, I'm 30, so I find things back in the 80's scarier than anything mnade now a days.
i would consider "the thing" to be more of a gore-based horror thriller. dark seed is kind of a laughable insult to H.R. giger, but i've only watched retsupurae play it and make fun of it a lot.
psychological horror isn't horror based on actual monsters or aliens, it's based on the fragility of the human mind, usually with an unreliable perspective that isn't based in reality at all, people trapped in their own head. check out "jacobs ladder".
Then pretty much any horror anything can be a psychological horror if it's described like that.
conventional horror has a perspective of an outsider observing events unfolding, like jason vorhees hiding around a corner to stab someone. psychological horror is from the perspective of an unstable persons mind....actually why not just read wikipedia on it? lol https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_horror
Because Wikipedia is a poor choice for a definition on anything since it can be changed on a whim.
But I'm serious, if the person is feeling a sense of danger, or feel like they're in a situation that is completely off putting, anything can be psychological horror.
Like I said about The Thing, or Dark Seed. You dunno who the thing infected, or when that alien's gonna hatch from your head, or what kind of purpose it lives for, which only adds to the danger.
You bring up Jason Voorhees. Ok, Say Jason comes out of the corner and does kill someone, and someone behind him/her sees it and runs. Ok, and Jason doesn't kill this person for a relatively long time during the film. Yes, you know Jason wants to kill them, but you don't know when, where, how, it's mind games really, that adds again to the psychological horror aspect. Yes, it's not as textbook as what you see the term, but anything horror, can still be psychological horror.
>Implying it's arguing.
>Implying Wikipedia is a study form.
>Implying I don't know horror.
wikipedia uses sources, if you don't check those, you don't really know how to use wikipedia.