Undertale

Undertale

Blessed Evelyn 2016 年 1 月 8 日 下午 8:36
Why do people treat r34 like it's a bad thing?
I was gulp BRAVE one night, and typed into google "Undertale r34".
I was scarred and I'll never look at Sans the same way again, but for the most part it was pretty well done.
Which begs the question: Why do people bring it up as a counterargument to why the game is good?
< >
目前顯示第 16-30 則留言,共 71
Something Hank 2016 年 1 月 8 日 下午 9:16 
This ain't boneless meat, baby.
jahcoin investor 2016 年 1 月 8 日 下午 9:17 
yea it was "well done" ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) (im sorry i couldnt help myself)
Seraphita 2016 年 1 月 8 日 下午 9:17 
引用自 Boney Hank
This ain't boneless meat, baby.
This is rather meatless bones. Because skeleton, y'know...?
Something Hank 2016 年 1 月 8 日 下午 9:19 
引用自 Sera
引用自 Boney Hank
This ain't boneless meat, baby.
This is rather meatless bones. Because skeleton, y'know...?

I might not have any, but I do LIKE them with meat on their bones.
Sneaky 2016 年 1 月 8 日 下午 11:00 
引用自 Boney Hank
引用自 jouster500
Bones.

Oh baby give me that marrow.
"Oh baby give me that marrow"
*howls with laughter*

On the topic of the R34 thing, some people really don't like seeing the characters they love having sex, especially the caretaker of the ruins who is just like a mother! >:torielsad: "why?"
Valmar 2016 年 1 月 8 日 下午 11:02 
I can imagine Alphys and Undyne as a lesbian couple, so that's justifiable, I guess.
Archmage MC 2016 年 1 月 8 日 下午 11:34 
引用自 kamyarm007
Insecurities is my guess.


引用自 Dylan
because they don't wanna see characters they love having sex

Its actually REALLY sad that if we put say, Sans vs Toriel in a Deathbattle, it would have its critics but mostly be celebrated. AKA celebrating DEATH.

But put them in a situation where they have sex, it would be mostly shunned, shamed, or told as WRONG. AKA dennouncing LIFE.

Same for the rest of society. Violence is OK to show to little kids, Sex isn't. And since they never learn about Sex, they do it with no idea of the consiquences and bam, theres a huge reason for all those teen pregnencies.
最後修改者:Archmage MC; 2016 年 1 月 8 日 下午 11:37
deltaTom 2016 年 1 月 8 日 下午 11:36 
引用自 Archmage MC
引用自 kamyarm007
Insecurities is my guess.


引用自 Dylan
because they don't wanna see characters they love having sex

Its actually REALLY sad that if we put say, Sans vs Toriel in a Deathbattle, it would have its critics but mostly be celebrated. AKA celebrating DEATH.

But put them in a situation where they have sex, it would be mostly shunned, shamed, or told as WRONG. AKA dennouncing LIFE.

Same for the rest of society. Violence is OK to show to little kids, Sex isn't. And since they never learn about Sex, they do it with no idea of the consiquences and bam, theres a huge reason for all those teen pregnencies.
This.
Valmar 2016 年 1 月 9 日 上午 12:09 
引用自 Archmage MC
Its actually REALLY sad that if we put say, Sans vs Toriel in a Deathbattle, it would have its critics but mostly be celebrated. AKA celebrating DEATH.

But put them in a situation where they have sex, it would be mostly shunned, shamed, or told as WRONG. AKA dennouncing LIFE.

Same for the rest of society. Violence is OK to show to little kids, Sex isn't. And since they never learn about Sex, they do it with no idea of the consiquences and bam, theres a huge reason for all those teen pregnencies.
Well thought-out.

Better to teach safe sex than ever glorify violence, which Western society current LOVES to do...
Sneaky 2016 年 1 月 9 日 上午 12:10 
引用自 Archmage MC
引用自 kamyarm007
Insecurities is my guess.


引用自 Dylan
because they don't wanna see characters they love having sex

Its actually REALLY sad that if we put say, Sans vs Toriel in a Deathbattle, it would have its critics but mostly be celebrated. AKA celebrating DEATH.

But put them in a situation where they have sex, it would be mostly shunned, shamed, or told as WRONG. AKA dennouncing LIFE.

Same for the rest of society. Violence is OK to show to little kids, Sex isn't. And since they never learn about Sex, they do it with no idea of the consiquences and bam, theres a huge reason for all those teen pregnencies.
Wow. I never thought of it that way. So wait, If we have violent children's cartoons like tom and jerry and tmnt teaching kids that violence is ok, What if they made a friz the cat child-friendly version and show the kids that sex is ok?
Mouse Lover 2016 年 1 月 9 日 上午 12:56 
引用自 Archmage MC
引用自 kamyarm007
Insecurities is my guess.


引用自 Dylan
because they don't wanna see characters they love having sex

Its actually REALLY sad that if we put say, Sans vs Toriel in a Deathbattle, it would have its critics but mostly be celebrated. AKA celebrating DEATH.

But put them in a situation where they have sex, it would be mostly shunned, shamed, or told as WRONG. AKA dennouncing LIFE.

Same for the rest of society. Violence is OK to show to little kids, Sex isn't. And since they never learn about Sex, they do it with no idea of the consiquences and bam, theres a huge reason for all those teen pregnencies.
This is why I love the internet.
That Guy 2016 年 1 月 9 日 上午 1:13 
So, if you saw porn of something you like, how would you react? Disgusted? Confused?


I'd be disgusted
最後修改者:That Guy; 2016 年 1 月 9 日 上午 1:13
Seraphita 2016 年 1 月 9 日 上午 1:23 
引用自 That Guy
So, if you saw porn of something you like, how would you react? Disgusted? Confused?

I'd be disgusted
Don't see it then. Don't act like you don't know that porn of everything exists. This is a fact.
Valmar 2016 年 1 月 9 日 上午 1:32 
引用自 That Guy
So, if you saw porn of something you like, how would you react? Disgusted? Confused?


I'd be disgusted
What about senseless violence of something not canonically violent? Sex is better than violence... make sex, not war... :P
That Guy 2016 年 1 月 9 日 上午 1:33 
引用自 dONALD tRUMP
A neutral ending occurs under any of these conditions:

If the protagonist does not befriend at least one plot pivotal character (Papyrus, Undyne, Alphys)
If the protagonist kills at least one monster.
If the protagonist does not complete the Genocide Route.

The Neutral Route ends with the protagonist escaping the Underground alone. There are a variety of different possible variations of this ending depending on the choices made throughout the game.
True Pacifist Route

For a more detailed explaination of this route, see True Pacifist Route.This endings occurs only when the following criteria are met:

A Neutral Route has been completed.
No enemies were killed throughout the game. (The protagonist cannot gain any EXP (and as a result, they cannot progress past LV 1.)
Papyrus, Undyne, and Alphys have been befriended.

The True Pacifist Route ends with the barrier being broken, and the protagonist and the monsters of the Underground being able to leave. Additionally, this route will feature the True Pacifist Ending Credits.
Genocide Route

For a more detailed explaination of this route, see Genocide Route.

This endings occurs only when all of the enemies in each area (Ruins, Snowdin Forest, Waterfall, Hotland/Core) are killed until none remain. This includes all bosses.

Completing the Genocide Route leads to the destruction of the game's world. Upon re-launching the game after a completed Genocide Route, the first human asks the player to give up their soul to them in exchange for the recreation of the world. This effectively acts in the same way as a true reset, yet it irrevocably alters the True Pacifist ending.

Alright, so, what does this have to do with this thread?
< >
目前顯示第 16-30 則留言,共 71
每頁顯示: 1530 50

張貼日期: 2016 年 1 月 8 日 下午 8:36
回覆: 71