Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Very High texture actually are 4096x4096 which is really high and vram demending
but as already mentioned you should have the textures no higher than high.
1600x900
Stop being a whiney ♥♥♥♥♥, drop the textures to high for NO noticable difference and play the ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ game.
You can't max out games with a 970, simple.
Yep, that explains why am I running Witcher 3 on ultra using GTX 970 with no issues and being at 55fps at the lowest.
Same goes for Dying Light (which simply looks STUNNING).
You definitely "can't max out games using GTX 970". That's totally out of question!
Geez, some people...
The 970 is the recommended GPU and guess what - the 970 runs the game at high settings just fine.
It has been confirmed that the only real 'VISIBLE' difference between high and very high textures in this game is the cutscenes and close ups of Laura.
She has slightly better and 'clearer' mud textures and facial textures on the very high setting. That is it. Seriously even Nvidia's own guide said that is the main visible difference.