Anyone with RX 480 or RX 580 ?

[Makarov]

if you have rx 480 or rx 580. CAN YOU do BENCHMARK and post results with this settings ?

resolution 1920x1080
-SSAA X2
textures VERY HIGh
pure hair VERY HIGH
HBAO+
all others MAX OUT / VERY HIGH
if you can do benchmark with this and post results here. THANKS !!!

[Makarov]

Opprinnelig skrevet av NewHope:

Rise of the Tomb Raider DX12, Very High, High Textures, SMAA 80 FPS
RX 580 Saphire

Thank you , and can you tell me your fps with VERY HIGH textures ?

[Potato of DOOM!!!!]

I have a Ryzen 1700 with 16GB and an Rx 480 and get with everything on Ultra + SSAA x2 about 44.47 fps avg

[Brave]

RX 480@1425MHz (all options maxed out with SSAA 2x): 47,52 FPS

[Makarov]

Thank you .... Is gameplay smoth with fps around 45 or ?
with vsync ON. ???

[Brave]

The SSAA filter in this game was really bad implemented. I prefer run with "SMAA on" and "vsync off" to maintain a higher average FPS (69,71 in the benchmark).

[Artoriaz]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Brave:

The SSAA filter in this game was really bad implemented. I prefer run with SMAA and Vsync off to maintain a higher average FPS (69,71 in the benchmark).

Its not badly implemented, it just runs the game at 2 or 4 times the resolution and downscales it to your moniters one. When your PC is runing a game at 2k or 4k its obviously going to experience a huge drop in performance.

[Brave]

Opprinnelig skrevet av JonathanWhiting13:

Its not badly implemented, it just runs the game at 2 or 4 times the resolution and downscales it to your moniters one. When your PC is runing a game at 2k or 4k its obviously going to experience a huge drop in performance.

So, please explain to me why when I run at 2560x1440(2k) I get more higher avg FPS(51,87) then running at 1920x1080 with SSAA enable (47,52 FPS)?

[Artoriaz]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Brave:

Opprinnelig skrevet av JonathanWhiting13:

Its not badly implemented, it just runs the game at 2 or 4 times the resolution and downscales it to your moniters one. When your PC is runing a game at 2k or 4k its obviously going to experience a huge drop in performance.

So, please explain to me why when I run at 2560x1440(2k) I get more higher avg FPS(51,87) then running at 1920x1080 with SSAA enable (47,52 FPS)?

The downsampleing process probably uses some CPU/GPU power but that happens in all sample size AA, not just in this game. It never has exactly the same performance as running it native but it is only a few fps difference.

[Ambry]

What kinda thread is this? You know you can just look up benchmarks on youtube, right?

[Makarov]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Fraolinch:

What kinda thread is this? You know you can just look up benchmarks on youtube, right?

on youtube there NOT benchmarks of this game with SSAA x2 and rx 480/580, otherwise i wouldnt ask here !!! :P :P :p

[Ambry]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Makarov:

Opprinnelig skrevet av Fraolinch:

What kinda thread is this? You know you can just look up benchmarks on youtube, right?

on youtube there NOT benchmarks of this game with SSAA x2 and rx 480/580, otherwise i wouldnt ask here !!! :P :P :p

There's literally tons of them. At least be honest and admit you're just a lazy ♥♥♥♥ who couldn't be arsed to take 10 seconds to do a simple search.

[Artoriaz]

I googled rise of the tomb raider rx 580 benchmark and the first one matches what you want.
Anyway here you go:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzGfzvvf2lg

[Makarov]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Fraolinch:

Opprinnelig skrevet av Makarov:

on youtube there NOT benchmarks of this game with SSAA x2 and rx 480/580, otherwise i wouldnt ask here !!! :P :P :p

There's literally tons of them. At least be honest and admit you're just a lazy ♥♥♥♥ who couldn't be arsed to take 10 seconds to do a simple search.

I not lazy !!!! go on YT and try to find rx 480/580 with SSAA X2 , nobody did bench with ssaa x2 because they afraid to show low fps. THanks !!!

[Artoriaz]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Makarov:

Opprinnelig skrevet av Fraolinch:

There's literally tons of them. At least be honest and admit you're just a lazy ♥♥♥♥ who couldn't be arsed to take 10 seconds to do a simple search.

I not lazy !!!! go on YT and try to find rx 480/580 with SSAA X2 , nobody did bench with ssaa x2 because they afraid to show low fps. THanks !!!

SSAA is pointless pretty much because there is not much of a visual improvment but because your outputting to 1440p and then downscaling there is a huge performance drop compaired to using post processing like SMAA or FXAA.

[Ambry]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Makarov:

I not lazy !!!! go on YT and try to find rx 480/580 with SSAA X2 , nobody did bench with ssaa x2 because they afraid to show low fps. THanks !!!

You're the very definition of lazy and here's why :

1- There ARE benchmarks with SSAA x2
2- Even if there weren't, how hard is it to take a maxed out benchmark and divide the result by two? Oh but that's right, you're too lazy to even just do that.