安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
Just like the original.
Cook the hamster in Maniac Mansion (Don't try this at home, kids!)
One of the two secret achieves in the Maniac Mansion portion of the game
Aside from launching it that is the only other achievement for Maniac Mansion.
Thanks for the correction, edited post in question
Are you thinking Red Bull or Monster, or some Starbucks thing instead? All far behind Pepsi in sales, which equals less recognizable and less likely to be understood. In fact, the Pepsi logos make it a nice throwback reference, to a time when we wern't inundated with off the shelf beverage choices.
I guess it could have been something healthier like V8 (or some gluten free drink for the hipsters), but why? You're cooking a hamster, for goodness sakes...I think political correctness went out the door already.
(besides, fruit drinks are already in the game, and can be used instead...so I'll say the Pepsi is adding 'variety')
Maybe you want somethig edgier, like a PBR, Bud, Corona? Maybe change the cigar to marijuana, too? Yeah, let's not, thanks.
Or could you be questioning product placement at all? What, did I miss a memo that that was not done anymore...did I imagine all those Apple iPads, iPhones and Airs on so many TV shows recently?
Edit: Reminding myself a bit more about it, the Pepsi thing has a bit of historical value, as it was the *first* product plaement ad in a video game.
Actually you are way off on all of your points as far as the topic is concerned. My claim of this being an oversight was in the legal context, nothing else. Sorry if I wasn't clear.
I definitely don't think it was an oversight, I think it was keeping this version as true to the source as possible, which is the right choice. One of the big problem with product placement, or even the use of technology in a game/movie/tv show, is that it dates the end product and makes it just a little less relatable years later. But that's not Double Fine's problem to solve.
Yes, I'm considering that Disney isn't *really* involved in this, but they did have to give permission to revisit it and again, I don't think Pepsi would have wanted to question anything that might have remotely hindered a billion dollar deal at the time (or even now).
...but who knows...I'm just talking out of my ear cause I'm bored. *shrug*
Edit: Shpeeling Corektians!
Fair enough, though I know some older Nintendo games released on later systems via Virtual Console made changes of the same ilk. The top example that comes to mind is Wave Race 64 using Kawasaki product placement. A decade plus later the game was re-released with all references of Kawasaki removed and replaced by Nintendo DS ads (ironically, when the original Wave Race 64 came out, Nintendo DS didn't exist).
I was thinking of something along those lines as the two seem similar to me.
I agree, the reply I made above to MUBI Merc better illustrated my line of thought but I understand where you both are coming from,
That was another one I thought about too, his brand was only for contract for I think 5-7 years in the event a remake was made then the edit would have to happen, IIRC Nintendo killed the contract due to a domestic dispute with his girlfriend. While Pepsi hasn't done anything to get bad press that I know of, I just considered two different development companies (albeit with some of the same developers) either had the same license or it was an oversight, it was easier for me to think the latter but I fully agree that this is a coup for Pepsi and Double Fine and if it was in fact intentional then good for Double Fine to keep it real for old and new fans (however, the easter egg in the original DOTT isn't the same as the one in the Remaster - the 1993 original used the 1987 C64 and the Remaster used the 1988 MS DOS (the better of the two)