Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Unfortunately, you might get placed above or below where you should be depending on who you were playing with in qualifying. If you had people that I mentioned above, it's hard to win enough to get placed decently for example.
Now what this doesn't completely take into account are people who are still good players but who don't play many Ranked matches, as you really need to be putting in a lot of games to climb the ladder... But of course, the more you play, the more experience you get and the more you'll improve, so the system still works decently as far as how good the person is at playing Ranked.
Really tough to say. It's quite possible to face a really bad Plat, and then face a Bronze player who could absolutely smash your face in. The ranked system is completely broken so I would not put a lot of stock in it. Technically speaking, Gold is considered about average, but the nature of the ranked system means a lot of good players can get stuck in that Silver/Gold tier. A lot of players in Plat aren't necessarily more skilled, they just have a higher tolerance for grinding.
Pretty safe to say that most Diamond and Masters players are very good or excellent, though.