Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Personally, I'm indifferent with this 3 and 4.
The risk in itself is pretty high unless you're dealing with more than one person.
I think is one is fine, to be honest. I'd say on the topic of his 3, if he cancels his 3 during it, he shouldn't be able to bring it back up though.
I don't understand how he is capable of doing so much damage in his damage stance AND still have as much sustain and tank as other warriors. I don't think I have ever seen anyone go into his tank stance since the power and his innate heal offsets any marginal decrease in protections. Its like they decided that they wanted him to have the damage and lockdown of an assassin without any loss in damage.
I remember when Ravana used to be as oppressive as Achilles currently is, but they went to great lengths to tone down Ravana. Its bizarre that they created a new character who embodies the very thing they spent years trying to balance.
They need to significantly reduce his protections and health while in the damage stance to be comparable to that of an assassin, and his armored stance should be tankier. In his current state I do not know how any solo laner save for a select few cannot be overwhelmed by him.
So you want him to be a ravana? lol ravana has no where near as much poke and harass also he is a warrior warriors are naturally tanky but can also dish out damage duh. Especially when you go into the supposely dmg stance who would have known! just lock him down and blow him up or go more burst damage he is a very nimble poking machine any healing counters the crap out of him and he just becomes a mild annoyance except for the occasional stun hear and their
In S3, Ravana had a skillset that was very similar to that of Achilles: high sustain through his 3 (back then it had a shorter cooldown and greater heal), high tankability, and in general high damage output. The devs slowly began to gut away at his kit by reducing the sustain in lane, which forced him out of the meta as a solo laner. Then, players started using him in the jungle since he had great gank potential....and well the rest is history.
I was arguing that Hi-Rez is repeating the very same mistakes by making Achilles be uncontested in solo lane by giving him psuedo-assassin stats with the tankability of a warrior.
Achilles oppression in solo lane is absolutely unreal, especially with items that give innate sustain (warrior's blessing and gladiator's shield). There is no blowing him out unless you gank him repeatedly, because his poke and set-ups are way too strong atm.
I agree, I m not a fan of hybrid classes as they tend to be weak in a category or too strong overall. Its even more of an issue when its the warrior as Hi-Rez tends to give them a bunch of tankiness without any downsides.
1) Stone of Gaia got butchered. Besides, his poke damage is so high that SOG does noting in the long run.
2) Its not only HP, he tanks as well as other warriors in his damage stance.
3) Achilles will always win lane. If he forces yiy ti your tower, he will steal your buffs and rotate while you are left to defend the incoming wave.
4) You shouldn't rotate if you are losing lane, underleveled, and a minion wave is incoming