Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If compare it with FO1, 2, I'd say Resurrection has clearer main theme, and storyline is pretty memorable and neat.
After finishing the game, I was surprised I can remember every town's features and details, and I found they are all connected with the same core, which is very neatly presented in the openning(I'd rather not spoil it).
Companions are more helpful and emotional connected, more like traditional cRPG companion feature, which is satisfying.
Although the final antagonist could've been written more compelling, his setting really got some potential.
Overall, I'd say Resurrection is a spiritual presentation of original Fallout with surprising improvments.
The spoiler you mentioned is in fact Fallout 1.5 ressurection. Fallout 1.5 ressurection dont punish you if you play evil character(like F1 and F2), quite the opposite, Some people even said if you are selfish prick and dont care abour morality of your choices the game is easier than when you try to be a god guy.
Fallout 1.5: Resurrection was also amazing but it had less familiar feeling as it was based on a whole new area. Maybe it was just my character build at the time but I feel like 1.5 was also the more difficult game. Especially what comes to fights (or maybe it was just my combat driven character build).
You should play both :)