Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
even in fallout 1/2 it was RIFE with tech... dont know why you think the installments post fallout 1 (maybe 2) are any more futuristic...
if your refering to fallout 4 and sanctuary hills keep in mind that even in the real world there are different levels of wealth and living across the country, nora and nate are no doubt middle class or higher unlike residents on the outskirts of places like DC (fallout 3) who lived more or less basic lives with minimal tech integration.
as for the artstyle i felt it always stayed pretty consistent as far as graphical upgrades go (i.e robobrains / protectrons/etc)
Yes, of course the content they took from the previous games would look similar, it's the new things they've added that aren't true to the fallout theme.
Tech of what people in the 50s thought the future would look like and 50s pop culture films. Google old 50s science magazines, comics and sci-fi films; you'll clearly see where Fallout got it's influence from.
You can argue about execution but Androids is a classic sci-fi thing.