Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Then place 1 or more container extenders that either directly touch that container controller, or another container extender. Each extender will increase the volume of the controller they are attached to.
Container controllers cannot touch each other, and container extenders from other controllers cannot touch each other either.
You can Have as many of the 3 type of container controllers and accompanying container extensions as you please. Vehicle weapons can only use ammo placed into a ammo container controller. One use for multiple container controllers for regular inventory is when you are using a constructor and need one box for input then one box for output.
I also wonder if container extenders and container controller must touch regular cargo boxes?
I was absolutely convinced that you have to connect container extenders and container controller to regular cargo box, so that cargo box would be extended also lol.
But now I'm thinking, why are container extenders needed? when you can instead add a regular cargo box instead.
Large container Volume is 16000 , Mass - 1,25 t
Container controller Volume is 8000 , Mass - 625 kg
Container extension Volume is 8000 , Mass - 616 kg
625 + 616 = 1241 kg 1,24 t is not so much less weight
And
Regular container does not draws CPU -0
Container controller - 960 CPU
Container extension -960 CPU
I play with the limits disabled, so my only consideration is the number of slots available. Because of that, and given that no small-vessel cargo boxes have 128 slots, in small vessels at least I always use Controllers (with no Extensions) in my small ships whenever possible. In my bases and CVs, where the larger cargo boxes do have 128 slots, I may use either depending upon my mood and the weather that day.
Thanks, it was helpful. I am learning about weight, volume and CPU. Ha, ha, I would never think that I should experience the challenge and interest in it. lol
Then there is volume... some things are pretty large, if you want to store them in one container and not have "20 cargo boxes with CV thrusters" and such you will have to use controllers/extensions.
Another example is SV/HV ammo. Single block holds so little that ammo controller + extensions is the only reasonable way to go. And SV/HV storage in general - single cargo box is so small a lot of stuff simply cannot be stored there.
It was very interesting thank you, I am starting to get much better perception about volume and weight.
But yeah, early game, I use cargo boxes/ammo boxes in my base, eventually after I acquire more stuff, I end up with at least 2 container controllers one for input, one for output. Individual 2x cargo boxes still for non base ammo, armor/boosts,guns, blocks ,misc, fuel/O2, etc..I use one for input to Decon, and its output goes to input container for constructors.
As base/ores grow, I add 2 more for furnaces, Raw Ores and Refined Ingots. Ammo eventual moves to one Container Controller, and blocks to another. A mega base can easily have 5 full 320k controllers and one 320k controller for ammo, with slightly smaller ones for the furnace raw ores/refined ingots, as the ingots will move into the input one eventually.