Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The fact of the matter is, newer games do more math on each pixel, regardless of if it's optimal or not. If you compare the featureset this game provides against contemporaries from the PS360 era, you can go from 25% load at 500mhz to 25x the clockspeed and more than double the usage in this game. Does it really look fifty times better?
TL:DR diminishing returns hit a long time ago for rasterization.
But it got better over time - can't remember if that "time," was due to optimization or simply it took so long that later generations of hardware auto solved the problem?
One thing I am sure about, except for the date, was the addition of an extra super high graphics setting called "nighmare mode." It would only show up on the settings menu if GPU had in excess of - 8GB Vram. My old but great gtx 1080ti Pascal had 11GB, so I could use it.
Can't remember if it was better though.
What annoys me, is a bit off topic, but it is 3 gens of gpu back and all GTX 1080ti had a full 11GB DDR5X vram.
Now I own a RTX 3080ti Asus Strix gaming OC, but all time time later it only has 12GB vram.
I know there is more to it like faster vram, blah blah.. but I don't buy it. An addition of 1GB over several years and two full gpu generations certainly isn't impressive!
I dont think you'd like the price if it had 24gb of VRAM, VRAM is not cheap
Not sure why nightmare mode would only show up if you had in excess of 8gb VRAM?
it doesnt use up 8gb
I think I wasn't clear, sorry. I don't mean nighmare mode game play. It was an extra graphics setting, just one, SHADOWS, which adds one level above level Ultra. But that only appears with either 6 or 8 GB cards. It makes sense, in 2016, people were still using 2GB cards at the low end. 4GB was kind of normal. 7 years ago!
About comparing video card vram from then and now - I was being sarcastic. Guess it doesn't work in text - sarcasm I mean.
I just played now, last post I hadn't started yet so my memory is poor. Great thing is I maxed out all graphics, and used the "nightmare," Shadows setting and man, on modern gear it is smooth. My monitor is 170Hz, but I set to Max 150fps. It never dropped even once! Next time I'll run it at monitor max.
Still a fantastic game.
but with it on, it doesnt even touch 8gb of vram
maybe the limit was 6 as you said? it does go over 6
a 4gb card would not cut it vram wise
I used to run it on another PC with an RX 580
Ran great on it, did not look as pretty since the game only lets you set what options will fit in 4gb vram, but it ran well, at 1440p too.
Eternal looks great too with everything maxed out
My memory sucks so I won't guess anything.
I do want to say though, that playing it again today was great. Next play all maxed out at 165 fps limit.
Id forgotten how much enjoyment it can give!!