安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3pQ0oO_cDE
Punctuation is important in a statement like that.
That being said, time to eat kids!
I really don't know anything about Polygon. But just like there are people who are not very good at games still buy and play them because they enjoy it, so I am not sure why it is a big deal there is a journalist who is not very good at games. They just need to review the game for their audience.
It can be hard to give a good opinion of game mechanics if you are unable to utilize said mechanics. Watch the highlight reel I posted - with gameplay like that, the reviewer could honestly say that the gunplay in the game sucks - and they would be technically honest given their experience.
But it wouldn't be at all reflective of the actual experience for even an average gamer.
Did they give an opinion? I didn't see any reviewing in the bits I watched. Didn't hear anybody talking about it either. It's just a video of somebody running around and shooting.
Considering I didn't watch the whole thing though, I could have missed the review part.
Polygon has a history of being more focused on injecting politics into games rather than focusing on games themselves. They aren't honest "journalists" or "gamers". These people fall into the same category as failed liberal arts students who are stuck living with their parents and the only paying job they can find is one writing fluff pieces for a website that is diminishing in relevance by the day.
No, that is the footage of the man who eventually wrote the review playing. That video is what Polygon put up as their "hit reel" for Doom's gameplay.
You could argue that maybe he played more and actually was able to do things like move and shoot at the same time, however the fact that these are the highlights of gameplay chose by the publication, it certainly doesn't seem so.
Well their audience could be people generally not very good at games, so that information could be relevevent for those type of people. No review is universal, and are written for an audience who have similar likes and dislikes as the reviewer.
ok, you could be right. But it just looked more like somebody just screwing around with the early game mechanics and not really concentrating on gameplay..
Fair points.
Polygon does try to bill themselves as somewhat of a hardcore gamer site however, which is probably why this kind of play resulted in a rather substantial backlash.
I personally would say that in order to review a product, one should have some proficiency with it - unless the product is one where proficiency is irrelevant. You wouldn't find a review of a high performance sports car done by a 90-year-old man who drove under 30MPH the whole ride terifically useful, unless your main interest was the seat warmers.
I don't know, this debate is several days old already, and rehashing it is relatively pointless anyway.