Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That being said, id can't be expected to support hardware that is long past EOL now. They may fix the common Xfi issues, but I doubt it.
Apparently, it needs to be set to 24-bit, 44.1kHz in order to work.
Bug with X-fi cards it looks like (and some other surround solutions).
https://steamcommunity.com/app/379720/discussions/0/357286119105506055/
Interesting.
Do you have to option to use an optical out with DDL or DTS NEO instead of analog outputs?
I'm just trying to eliminate possibilities here.
Edit: Just also out of curiousity - have to tested the center channel when something like a Hayden voice over is playing? I've seen a few games that take center being the "dialog" channel very literally.
Interesting idea: that the game may reserve center channel for certain dialog. I'm pretty sure I was paying attention during a Hayden voiceover, but I'll need to test that now that I'm actively thinking of it!
X-Fi does active re-encoding for Dolby Digital for sure, and I am relatively sure for DTS Connect (depending on the X-Fi variant) -
http://support.creative.com/kb/ShowArticle.aspx?sid=68520
You need the DDL pack - for Titanium cards, I believe it is free.
http://support.creative.com/Downloads/searchdownloads.aspx?strString=DDL_PCAPP_LB_3_00_06.exe&ShowDetais=%22%20rel=%22nofollow
You need to purchase it as an add-on otherwise.
I thought that Creative had stopped charging for it (since it's kind of a ♥♥♥♥ move, like their old proprietary-ish SPDIF optical connectors), so your mileage may vary.
Stupid moves like that (and lack of real support) is why my X-Fis have been junked, and my Recon3D is only in my PC becuase it looks cool.
(I've actually been considering the Creative ZxR. Haven't pulled the trigger yet because of the price.)
Do you mind if I ask what it is you are looking for out of a sound card?
The ZxR is actually lesser than many onboard sound solutions now, and it really isn't worth the price.
There are other options, especially in that price range, that are vastly superior in many ways, but they are going to be different depending on what you want.
A soundcard offloads audio processing work load from the CPU, thus minimizing the work that the CPU has to do and thus freeing up resources for the CPU to dedicate towards other tasks! A soundcard also typically has superior DAC's.
True for X-Fi, under Windows XP, yes.
Not the modern SB chips.
Since SoundCore, Creative chips are all software based - they don't even do hardware ASIO.
When Microsoft reworked the audio stack in Vista, mainly to eliminate BSODs from Creative drivers, Creative killed off any true hardware acceleration. That's one of the things ALchemy does, translates hardware EAX into software.
This is one of the primary reasons that both AMD and now nVidia have added hardware audio processing to their GPUs. Hardware audio acceleration is tricky to do through sound card drivers post-Vista, and Creative hasn't even tried.
I used to make the same argument as you, until I did some research when planning to upgrade my sound from X-Fi.
If you are going for audiophile quality, the ZxR is trumped by most USB DACs these days. If you are just going for enthusiast, my 4-year-old Intel motherboard has better capacitors, better SNR, and similar hardware DSP to the ZxR. Although the DACs are indeed a step lower, I use optical out anyway, negating any benefits.
If you need a home studio solution, either a the midrange Alesis mixing boards can handle input and output, with better DACs, more port options, and overall better build quality, or one of the many, many M-Audio solutions.
Seriously, look at the specs of the ZxR compared to, say, a Mayflower DAC, and check out the hardware acceleration of the SoundCore chips. On both counts, unfortunately, you will find Creative's solution lacking. Hence why other sound card makers are either still using X-Fi chipsets, or more custom solutions.
The only truly common use of Creative SoundCore chips is on cheap Chromebooks and a few gaming grade motherboards.
I loved Creative cards back in the day. The AWE64 and Audigy both changed how I viewed PC audio, and the X-Fi line was their crowning glory, despite some of the industry's worst drivers. Sadly though, they really have failed to innovate for much of the past decade, especially with internal sound solutions.
I know some of Creative's new soundcards do lack hardware support for EAX versions older than EAX 5.0, which effectively kills off any reason to have EAX since virtually nothing uses EAX 5.0/all the good games that had EAX support used v4.0 or older (Or the superior Aureal A3D, not made by Creative).
If your soundcard lacks the hardware support than ALchemy will fail to accurately reproduce the EAX audio effects for EAX 4.0 (and older) equipped games because it will fall back to software emulation.
But then again it has indeed been a long time since I properly looked in to this. I'm pretty sure that OpenAL and XAudio 2 allow proper access to the soundcard hardware for more than just EAX. Unsure about ASIO as I've never used or cared for it.
At the absolute minimum, a dedicated soundcard definitely frees up your CPU to do other tasks under Vista and newer unless you're playing a video game/program that uses either DirectSound, DirectSound3D, DirectMusic or Software acceleration for audio.
They literally use the same Cmedia sound chipsets as some motherboard solutions, with SoundCore handling hardware DSP - which is not accessible via drivers, it is only used for things like the headphone surround and reverb.
A ZxR literally offers no hardware benefits in terms of audio acceleration and CPU load - they use the same software CODECs as onboard.
I have even seen some clas that Creative's drivers have higher CPU usage than stock Cmedia drivers, but I have seen no actual proof.
You gain sometimes better DACs, and sometimes better components, but again, many enthusiast boards have equivalent - with some even including the SoundCore chips themselves for DSP.
ZxR is great if you want an all in one gimmick, but there are better solutions for each function, many of which cost less.
1: Quality sound (right now I output to a receiver's multi-channel input and some hefty Klipsch speakers.)
2: 5.1 surround support
3: As comprehensive as I can get when it comes to game audio system/s support (including older Legacy games, EAX, etc.)
Also, though I've never been a fan of custom EQ settings... I'm actually a big fan of the X-Fi's "Crystalizer". I leave it at about 50% most of the time.
I'm NOT a fan of switching between Game Mode and Entertainment Mode.
Also, when I finally upgrade my motherboard (may be an ASRock Fatal1ty Gaming Z170 Gaming K6+), I won't be able to use my PCI based F-Xi.