Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I wasn't able to find anything easily on the legality(christian or otherwise) on the practice of war trophies/spoils of war or dueling trophies in medieval times. I would love to see some real documentation if anyone has it.
My concern in regards to the game mechanic of looting a vanquished foe in self defense being logged as a crime, is just how gimmicky or roundabout will I need to play to avoid ever getting points in the "corpses looted" criminal statistic. Did the developers see this play style as a possibility and plan for it within the game to completion? I've read that There’s a quest where you are forced to loot a bandit and it counts as a crime. There is another quest where you have to loot hares to prove you killed them, but looting HARES counts as a crime.
Just how much of the game am I going to miss because of this statistic and how weirdly am I going to have to play to keep that statistic at 0?
I wouldn't recommend trying weird playstyles on 1st playthrough. But I'd say you miss more when playing the game in a normal way. Because then you're ignoring most of its non-linearity and roleplaying freedom and depth. You find more interesting ♥♥♥♥ when trying unusual approach
In the game Peshek's graverobbing quest right away shows Henry's concerns about robbing the dead. Even earlier in Skalitz in reference to local marauders. And there's a lot of talk throughout the game about 'knacker's job' and all that. Later Ulrich is outraged about Henry wanting to check out the dead merchant. And it goes on.
It is not completely clear and consistent, but implied enough to make me not surprised about that thing with statistics. If that's historically accurate or not - not sure, to some extent, I suppose. Ofc it's probably not the same thing to check dead person's pockets, or strip them naked. But gameplay wise it is
Right, well until someone has any proof besides thinking that they suppose it was true, i'm gonna just assume KCD is doing some exaggerated extrapolation historically.
In terms of game mechanics, if you walk up to the butchers body that's guarded by the dog and loot it, it's not considered a crime and is not logged under the criminal statistic...THIS IS AFTER you accuse Zbyshek of being a corpse looter yourself...not to mention all the other villagers corpses during that quest are free to loot without going under the criminal statistic. It doesn't engender confidence in the games ability to properly distinguish what is and isn't corpse looting, which in turn erodes ones confidence and faith that the developers made the game with this statistic in mind all the way through.
Right, that's initially why I decided to go with the no crime role play. I'm going to give it a shot but if it becomes something obviously terrible like some liege lord commands me to go grab some documents from a knave i'm supposed to dispatch and i'm forced to corpse loot i'm gonna be pissed.
I'm gonna go ahead and guess you can take items people don't actively have on their corpses without incurring story or criminal statistical changes as long as it's not all ready flagged as stealing.