Kingdom Come: Deliverance

Kingdom Come: Deliverance

View Stats:
kluader Apr 22, 2022 @ 10:07am
3
2
We ask for DLSS or AMD FSR, devs.
You made a superb game and players rewarded you for this by buying your game and making it successful. You still earn lots of money by selling this game.
You need to listen to your customers and add FSR support or DLSS at least.
Thanks
Originally posted by BetterWarrior:
These people are truly clueless, the devs don't have to give up on the sequel to have time for FSR or DLSS, they are both easy to do and can be done by a handful of developers, FSR can be done by a single dev and DLSS can be done by a few and has a plugin in UE4.

What's up with these weak arguments?

Anyway the game could really use one preferably FSR due to ease of implementation (one game modder did it in a day and the result is great)
the game really needs it as it struggle even with high end PCs.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 87 comments
MacSuibhne Apr 22, 2022 @ 10:28am 
I'm not sure how many people would choose DLSS or FSR, over a sequel. I wouldn't.

And since the devs have said, rather explicitly, that they're not "adding' or changing or working on this game anymore, I think your request is bound to be for naught.

The devs would, more or less, have to drop everything they're doing to reconfigure KCD. And then there would be bugs (as the devs have pointed out) and more people complaining about it.

It's not a win-win situation.
wjpower2003 Apr 22, 2022 @ 2:13pm 
Originally posted by MacSuibhne:
I'm not sure how many people would choose DLSS or FSR, over a sequel. I wouldn't.

And since the devs have said, rather explicitly, that they're not "adding' or changing or working on this game anymore, I think your request is bound to be for naught.

The devs would, more or less, have to drop everything they're doing to reconfigure KCD. And then there would be bugs (as the devs have pointed out) and more people complaining about it.

It's not a win-win situation.
:steamthis: The current game state is manageable even on my potato. A sequel is a far better investment.
Lusus Symphonia Apr 22, 2022 @ 3:07pm 
Originally posted by wjpower2003:
:steamthis: The current game state is manageable even on my potato. A sequel is a far better investment.
Hilarious.

1070 i7 6900k and the game runs like ass.

I wouldn't call my system a potato as it runs last generation games at a higher standard than the last gen consoles (ps4/xbox whatever).

Although I agree with you, the sequel will be a far better investment than adding graphical improvements to an aged game, please don't sit there and say the game state is manageable.. the game is ugly.
The author of this thread has indicated that this post answers the original topic.
BetterWarrior Apr 25, 2022 @ 8:19pm 
2
These people are truly clueless, the devs don't have to give up on the sequel to have time for FSR or DLSS, they are both easy to do and can be done by a handful of developers, FSR can be done by a single dev and DLSS can be done by a few and has a plugin in UE4.

What's up with these weak arguments?

Anyway the game could really use one preferably FSR due to ease of implementation (one game modder did it in a day and the result is great)
the game really needs it as it struggle even with high end PCs.
kluader Apr 29, 2022 @ 2:01pm 
Originally posted by BetterWarrior:
These people are truly clueless, the devs don't have to give up on the sequel to have time for FSR or DLSS, they are both easy to do and can be done by a handful of developers, FSR can be done by a single dev and DLSS can be done by a few and has a plugin in UE4.

What's up with these weak arguments?

Anyway the game could really use one preferably FSR due to ease of implementation (one game modder did it in a day and the result is great)
the game really needs it as it struggle even with high end PCs.
noooo, if you add FSR you cannot work on any other game for the rest of your life!!!111!!! /s
vine Apr 30, 2022 @ 7:18pm 
Originally posted by BetterWarrior:
These people are truly clueless, the devs don't have to give up on the sequel to have time for FSR or DLSS, they are both easy to do and can be done by a handful of developers, FSR can be done by a single dev and DLSS can be done by a few and has a plugin in UE4.

What's up with these weak arguments?

Anyway the game could really use one preferably FSR due to ease of implementation (one game modder did it in a day and the result is great)
the game really needs it as it struggle even with high end PCs.
you missed that KCD is Cryengine v3 game. there's no reason to invest any time, effort, money into kcd, its done sealed finished. it has done its purpose.
Antilowballer May 1, 2022 @ 2:35am 
Originally posted by vine:
you missed that KCD is Cryengine v3 game. there's no reason to invest any time, effort, money into kcd, its done sealed finished. it has done its purpose.
rofl
Gerarderloper Sep 28, 2022 @ 11:13pm 
I think the issue is that this version of CryEngine does not have sufficient ground work to enable DLSS2 or FSR2... However they could toss in FSR1.0 which players can already do themselves, but maybe the developer can apply it in a better way by integrating it.

DLSS was introduced to CryEngine AFTER this game was made I believe. Bit of a bummer, I also wish Bethesda would introduce FSR2.1 or DLSS2.3.4 to their games, not only would it help PC but also Console.

No doubt this game could benefit HUGELY on console with FSR2.1 which they can absolutely do! (they run RDNA2+ GPU's)
Originally posted by The_Riddick Linux:

No doubt this game could benefit HUGELY on console with FSR2.1 which they can absolutely do! (they run RDNA2+ GPU's)

I thought all versions of FSR were open source? Wouldn't think anyone would need AMD hardware to run it even considering consoles since I've got a gtx 1080 and can run FSR in games where it is supported. For kcd, hardware support isn't the issue anyways, it is the engine and the way FSR 2.0/DLSS is implemented but as you said FSR 1.0 would be possible and worthwhile.
Last edited by Four Little Diamonds; Sep 29, 2022 @ 3:24am
Sad Dec 11, 2022 @ 6:59pm 
WE WANT FSR AND DLSS SUPPORT
Lusus Symphonia Dec 12, 2022 @ 2:06am 
Originally posted by Red Monk:
Originally posted by wjpower2003:
:steamthis: The current game state is manageable even on my potato. A sequel is a far better investment.
Hilarious.

1070 i7 6900k and the game runs like ass.

I wouldn't call my system a potato as it runs last generation games at a higher standard than the last gen consoles (ps4/xbox whatever).

Although I agree with you, the sequel will be a far better investment than adding graphical improvements to an aged game, please don't sit there and say the game state is manageable.. the game is ugly.
Man this comment aged like milk, I now proclaim that 1070 and i7 6900k specs are potato compared to todays standards.
Antilowballer Dec 27, 2022 @ 3:16pm 
Originally posted by Sad:
WE WANT FSR AND DLSS SUPPORT
+1
333hronos Feb 13, 2023 @ 5:54am 
One more +1
BetterWarrior Feb 13, 2023 @ 7:44am 
The devs are still adding voice stuff but what really important is the FSR2/DLSS.
I was glad when the did the patch showing us they still care about the game.
Let's just hope that they won't use FSR / DLSS as a cover-up if they mess KC2's optimization, just like every other devs these days.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 87 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Apr 22, 2022 @ 10:07am
Posts: 87