Kingdom Come: Deliverance

Kingdom Come: Deliverance

Zobrazit statistiky:
GTX 1070 OC + I5-7600K = BARELY 60 FPS on 1080p medium preset??
Hey guys.

What do you think? Will there be a fixing patch coming or could the devs care less?

Regards,
ChrisB
< >
Zobrazeno 3145 z 65 komentářů
yeah.. um NO. Frankly, I don't care if you don't believe it.
djinnxy původně napsal:
yeah.. um NO. Frankly, I don't care if you don't believe it.
Lmao imagine that im shocked dont worry i did the work for you heres a 980ti going way below 60fps at 1080p ultra https://youtu.be/y7UsKEmydBk
You can overclock as much as you like you arent catching a 1080ti on that thing
Good to know. Apparently I won the card lottery then. Mine runs better than that. Note that I'm taking your word for it without watching the video.
djinnxy původně napsal:
Good to know. Apparently I won the card lottery then. Mine runs better than that. Note that I'm taking your word for it without watching the video.
Yeah id re sell it because apparently it grew some cores and memory while you were away. Note none of us believe you and you not posting a video makes your attempt at bragging about it even funnier
ok. bb now troll.
Sir Digby Chicken Caesar původně napsal:
1070FTW, i7-8700k, 1440p. At High settings my FPS stays around mid 50s, which isn't noticeably different from 60. Don't know why you expect a lot out of an i5 just because it has a high number after it. "Optimization" is just a buzzword mostly used by people who don't want to admit they need better hardware.

If you bothered to read the thread I have the exact same CPU as the op and no issues here with a lower end gpu. I5s work perfectly fine for all modern games. It's obviously something with his particular setup or software.
Naposledy upravil MaGicBush; 23. dub. 2018 v 21.57
Chris původně napsal:
chacolil původně napsal:
This game is just badly optimized, dont expect any good graphics to come from it. Devs were just a bunch of noobs trying to cash in by copying skyrim, tweak a few things here and there and call everything else that they couldnt code into it as realistic setting.

It`s your oppinion, but I don`t agree.
Its not my opinion its a fact. An opinion is when I think the game is bad because of my tastes. I know the game is bad because the game does not play at an optimized level. I dont have a beast of a machine, but I have a decent computer with a 980ti, i74790, 16 ram and a 4k tv. Now I dont expect to run this game at ultra high settings, but at least ultra should do it right? Nope, cant run it well there. So reduce it to high. Nope, high doesnt do it either. K, try going all the way down to medium? That should do it. Nope, the game still has fps drops even at medium. Hell, your posts show that you are TRYING hard to find workarounds into making the game work better with mods and commands. When you need modders to do the work for you, so that your game runs well, THATS called bad optimization.
Check toms hardware review of the game so you can see its benchmarks. It sucks.
Sir Digby Chicken Caesar původně napsal:
1070FTW, i7-8700k, 1440p. At High settings my FPS stays around mid 50s, which isn't noticeably different from 60. Don't know why you expect a lot out of an i5 just because it has a high number after it. "Optimization" is just a buzzword mostly used by people who don't want to admit they need better hardware.

Lmao..can't believe I just read that nonsense.

I'd also take my i5 8600k over a i7 8700k for gaming any day of the week. Did you even research your purchase or just pick the highest number thinking that was best for gaming? (sarcasm because we both know you did, lolol)
Naposledy upravil RyBo; 24. dub. 2018 v 0.03
Sir Digby Chicken Caesar původně napsal:
1070FTW, i7-8700k, 1440p. At High settings my FPS stays around mid 50s, which isn't noticeably different from 60. Don't know why you expect a lot out of an i5 just because it has a high number after it. "Optimization" is just a buzzword mostly used by people who don't want to admit they need better hardware.

CPU usage doesn´t get above 50% so don´t even get me started. Please take your 8700k and go pet it somewhere else. thx in advance
I just recently upgraded from a 970 to a 1070, and the performance is nearly identical. My 970 could handle medium to high settings and still hover around 60fps, and my 1070 is pretty much the same. My cpu is an i7-4790K and I have 16gigs of ram, so I don't really have an obvious bottleneck. This game just isn't kind on the 10 series cards. I've been waiting for an optimization patch before I go much further.
RyBo původně napsal:
Lmao..can't believe I just read that nonsense.

I'd also take my i5 8600k over a i7 8700k for gaming any day of the week. Did you even research your purchase or just pick the highest number thinking that was best for gaming? (sarcasm because we both know you did, lolol)

Go check out the benchmarks for yourself then, champ. More threads, far better multicore speed, far better OC potential. Find me any hardware site that doesn't consider it to be one of the best gaming CPUs on the market. I'll be happy with my purchase for a long time.



Chris původně napsal:
CPU usage doesn´t get above 50% so don´t even get me started. Please take your 8700k and go pet it somewhere else. thx in advance

Ok then you explain why you can't even get 50 FPS at 1080p on medium if it has nothing to do with hardware power without just saying "UNOPTIMIZED UNOPTIMIZED". You jokers just need to stop overusing this term every time you can't figure out what's wrong with your PC.
Naposledy upravil Mountain King; 24. dub. 2018 v 8.58
GTX 970, i7 4790k, and 16GB 1600MHz DDR3. At 1080p on some high and medium settings I get between low 40s and mid 50s FPS. Cutscenes usually drop to 30fps or below for some reason.
Naposledy upravil Jagick; 24. dub. 2018 v 9.32
i7-4770k@4GHz, 32 GB Ram, 1080Ti, 3440x1440:

At all Ultra and maxed out viewing distances it renders from 50 to 60 frames, when in the wildernis. Not complaining there, because Ultra Detail (especially in the woods) is way better than Witcher 3. It will likely only run at stable 60+ frames on future hardware, as is stated in game.

The real problem is still Rattay. With framerates low as 30 in the centre. Especially shadows seem to have a huge performance impact there. Would be understandable at night. KCD calculates shadows from torches. Witcher 3 didn't, even on highest settings. But there is no big framerate difference between day and night. Novigrad or Toussaint from Witcher 3 have much more, much better looking buildings. And can handle like ten times more NPCs in the streets. So, definitively something that could be optimised.

P.S.: If I render at only 1920x1080 I get up to 90 fps in the wildernes, but in rattay it still drops to 30 fps.
Naposledy upravil odhrain; 24. dub. 2018 v 12.44
Same as you but with a i7-8700k 32 gig ram 1080Ti 3440x1440 ssd all Ultra HD textures aliders max, but get 50-70 wilderness and 50 down to 35 in one part of Ratty. CPU and GPU are watercooled.
pohare původně napsal:
Same as you but with a i7-8700k 32 gig ram 1080Ti 3440x1440 ssd all Ultra HD textures aliders max, but get 50-70 wilderness and 50 down to 35 in one part of Ratty. CPU and GPU are watercooled.

Why do people mention their PC's are watercooled? Do you think that makes it run faster? That has nothing to do with your specs lol. Obviously just trying to brag.
Naposledy upravil MaGicBush; 24. dub. 2018 v 13.03
< >
Zobrazeno 3145 z 65 komentářů
Na stránku: 1530 50

Datum zveřejnění: 22. dub. 2018 v 12.50
Počet příspěvků: 65