Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
indeed.
never trust or listen to mainstream reviewers.
for many other games it was the opposite, games looked great on gameplay videos and E3 trailers and eventually came out like ♥♥♥♥ on release.
for honest individual opinions of the final version we can wait until release.
the best option will be to play it ourselves and decide from actual gameplay exprience.
You clearly haven't played a PB game before, or something like Technomancer. The games are easily worth the $60 price tag if you enjoy the sort of games these devs like to make. No AAA developer besides a small handful make ambitious games like these.
If a game is different, they will poorly rate it because it doesn't meet their criteria. Valley is an example of a good game that was poorly rated because it was different from mainstream titles.
It will be a cult classic, similar to Mount & Blade.
WH made the game for people, who can use their mind, who can think. Like old school games like Arx Fatalis, Fallout, Mafia and etc. They made cool mechanics, new tools and great story.
I guess, the game will get its fame after release, when everyone will see the finale product.
Many things to tell, but lesser to hear.
1. IGN has not been paid off.
2. IGN found out the developer stated himself he will not pander to social justice.