Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Perhaps you need some better dice combinations? Perhaps you tried other taverns/NPCs because each differ in difficulty and even on the range of bets?
That's exactly the way I play it. I may throw 600-800 points a round, the npcs are still doing better with common dices, just because they are either extremely lucky, or they are just made this way. I am playing on hardcore
If you still keep losing, you're playing the game wrong. Farkle involves a lot more strategy than one thinks. More often than not it is better to score just the highest scoring dies and chuck some other scoring dies back tinto the cup for another throw.
PS: There is also the 'perfect throw' perk under Agility, from level 12. If you have that, it's actually a cheat code, as that gives you even better results. You'd have to try really hard to lose with that perk on.
I have frankly never observed anything like that. With six loaded dice I usually take a large lead right away, and often win the game without the NPC ever even getting a chance to throw. I think you're imagining it. Even if I dont reach the winning score right away, the NPCs rarely catch up anywhere near. I would suggest you hone your actual Farkle skills.
I've seen a lot of people putting aside 3 threes, after all, it's a score, right? Wrong. With loaded dice, the chances are much higher that if you chuck them back in and throw again, at least two of them will be ones, resulting in a higher score. Unless I throw a street, I rarely score with anything but ones, and the odd five here and there.