Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So when they see that AI teams score like 7-9, they would say that the game is imbalanced. So, in either way, some players say that the game is not balanced.
From my pov, 48 actions mode is more affected by RNG than 90 action mode, but it is very intense and tactical anyway. You just don't have right for a mistake. You should clearly understand all your game possibilities and use them. There is less positioning, more pure action.
This could totally break your game but it's just an idea. If you maybe change the time increments between moves in the sim match. Meaning, instead of each move taking 2 minutes time; let it take more, like 5 minutes or more? ONLY FOR AI SIM MATCHES, not in a Player vs AI or Player vs Player games lol
No. More realism = more fun.
It has nothing to do with luck; it has everything to do with positioning your players in a way you can exploit an opening in the opposing defense, while keeping your own defense tight by the right combination of skills, talents, classes, and positions. THAT is Football Tactics.
90 turns is just a circus where games end 5-4 all the time.
I just wished the game was truly balanced such that 1st place individual awards (goals, assist, tackles, and saves) wasn't a given even with bad teams. Otherwise, the game is excellent. 60 turn is my favorite.