Battle royale?

[Baby Cakes]

This game SERIOUSLY needs a battle royale game mode. Can you imagine how fun it would be to queue up with the BOYS and get some four man teams running around Lothric?

Main reason I stopped playing this game.

[Warcrime Warren]

6 man arena. Take it or leave it.

[Baby Cakes]

Originally posted by Admiral Asskick:

6 man arena. Take it or leave it.

But there's no animation for entering the arena. If Elden Ring DLC doesn't have a battle bus being pulled by Torrent I'm seriously gonna refund.

[Warcrime Warren]

Originally posted by Baby Cakes:

Originally posted by Admiral Asskick:

6 man arena. Take it or leave it.

But there's no animation for entering the arena. If Elden Ring DLC doesn't have a battle bus being pulled by Torrent I'm seriously gonna refund.

Just leave already, noone wants you in this fandom. Especially not Miyazaki

[Baby Cakes]

Obviously the admiral has no good taste in games. Will anyone else agree taht ds3 needs battle ropyale?

[Victor Spacepyre]

Originally posted by Baby Cakes:

Obviously the admiral has no good taste in games. Will anyone else agree taht ds3 needs battle royale?

I don't know. For me DS is about failing, learning patterns and adapt. And I love this, because it also throws your mindset in the mix. You need to remain positive or atleast resist giving into frustration and anger, because that makes it harder (for me at least) to focus.

A Battle Royale is "over" once you died. You typically are matchmade against new players, leading to a different set of circumstances. So there is no enemy specific adaptation.
With DS especially I see a few issues because the whole game is balanced for you to pay attention to your limited resources (stamina, hp, estus, etc.). From my experience most BR offer a lot more resources to players.

I see why a BR in DS is intruiging, but I feel like it would change the formula to much for my personal taste.

[Baby Cakes]

Originally posted by Victor Spacepyre:

Originally posted by Baby Cakes:

Obviously the admiral has no good taste in games. Will anyone else agree taht ds3 needs battle royale?

I don't know. For me DS is about failing, learning patterns and adapt. And I love this, because it also throws your mindset in the mix. You need to remain positive or atleast resist giving into frustration and anger, because that makes it harder (for me at least) to focus.

A Battle Royale is "over" once you died. You typically are matchmade against new players, leading to a different set of circumstances. So there is no enemy specific adaptation.
With DS especially I see a few issues because the whole game is balanced for you to pay attention to your limited resources (stamina, hp, estus, etc.). From my experience most BR offer a lot more resources to players.

I see why a BR in DS is intruiging, but I feel like it would change the formula to much for my personal taste.

well they should at least add more emotes. Even if they're micro-transactions. The game is jsut too boring

[Warcrime Warren]

Originally posted by Baby Cakes:

Originally posted by Victor Spacepyre:

I don't know. For me DS is about failing, learning patterns and adapt. And I love this, because it also throws your mindset in the mix. You need to remain positive or atleast resist giving into frustration and anger, because that makes it harder (for me at least) to focus.

A Battle Royale is "over" once you died. You typically are matchmade against new players, leading to a different set of circumstances. So there is no enemy specific adaptation.
With DS especially I see a few issues because the whole game is balanced for you to pay attention to your limited resources (stamina, hp, estus, etc.). From my experience most BR offer a lot more resources to players.

I see why a BR in DS is intruiging, but I feel like it would change the formula to much for my personal taste.

well they should at least add more emotes. Even if they're micro-transactions. The game is jsut too boring

Finally, something we can agree on. /s