DARK SOULS™ III

DARK SOULS™ III

View Stats:
Justinyl Mar 19, 2016 @ 8:23pm
Dark souls 3 timeline
I think dark souls 3 come before 1. I mean look at that tower behind firelink shrine in DKS 3, it looks like that unaccessible ruined tower besides firelink in Dark souls 1. Or maybe time and space is distorted till past becomes present, future becomes past?
Last edited by Justinyl; Mar 19, 2016 @ 8:23pm
< >
Showing 1-15 of 21 comments
Argon Mar 19, 2016 @ 8:27pm 
Nobody can say anything for sure, but I am certain this is the 3rd in the timeline. The Age of Dragons lasted for "infinity" untill the first flame, and the Heirs are heirs to Gwyn, Lord of Cinder.
pretty sure miyazaki said ds3 is after ds2.
Justinyl Mar 19, 2016 @ 8:29pm 
Originally posted by (GI) Argon the Noble™:
Nobody can say anything for sure, but I am certain this is the 3rd in the timeline. The Age of Dragons lasted for "infinity" untill the first flame, and the Heirs are heirs to Gwyn, Lord of Cinder.

Yea, i can't wait to play this and unlock all the lore. And this time, the main character dun have to sacrifice himself to link the first flame
Justinyl Mar 19, 2016 @ 8:31pm 
Originally posted by (GI) Argon the Noble™:
Nobody can say anything for sure, but I am certain this is the 3rd in the timeline. The Age of Dragons lasted for "infinity" untill the first flame, and the Heirs are heirs to Gwyn, Lord of Cinder.

Maybe its the advanced technology use to create DKS 3 as compared to DKS 1 & 2. But the buildings in DKS 3 feels so new and undamaged, making it seems to be the start of everything
Roland of Gilead Mar 19, 2016 @ 9:46pm 
I beleive it is set a few thousand years after ds2. Plus the games tagline is "only embers remain". That means that the first flame has not been rekindled in quite some time.
TomTomDameChiclon Mar 19, 2016 @ 9:49pm 
But the fact that there are armors and weapons from both the previous dark souls pretty much confirms that it will be a direct sequel.
You also have the lords of cinder, the giants and the crown from ds2 and the abyss watchers that clearly ressemble artorias.
It seems to follow Aldia's ending where you seek to undo the curse but im not sure, I havent watched the latest videos.
Trusty Mar 19, 2016 @ 9:52pm 
Originally posted by Tyrant Embers:
I think dark souls 3 come before 1. I mean look at that tower behind firelink shrine in DKS 3, it looks like that unaccessible ruined tower besides firelink in Dark souls 1. Or maybe time and space is distorted till past becomes present, future becomes past?

It takes place multiple kingdoms after Dark Souls 2. Though spoilers lay in the reason why.
Lobo Mar 19, 2016 @ 10:27pm 
I don't think so
The item descriptions for Solaire's armor and the full red eye orb both say they are items from an older time
Hobo Misanthropus Mar 19, 2016 @ 11:31pm 
Originally posted by Trusty:
Originally posted by Tyrant Embers:
I think dark souls 3 come before 1. I mean look at that tower behind firelink shrine in DKS 3, it looks like that unaccessible ruined tower besides firelink in Dark souls 1. Or maybe time and space is distorted till past becomes present, future becomes past?

It takes place multiple kingdoms after Dark Souls 2. Though spoilers lay in the reason why.


Because Miyazaki is trying very hard to scrub away the memory of DS2. As he should.
BlazeRomulus Mar 20, 2016 @ 12:00am 
Originally posted by Hobo Misanthropus:
Originally posted by Trusty:

It takes place multiple kingdoms after Dark Souls 2. Though spoilers lay in the reason why.


Because Miyazaki is trying very hard to scrub away the memory of DS2. As he should.

He doesn't hate DS 2 and on that note, he's giving the same treatment to DS1.
Last edited by BlazeRomulus; Mar 20, 2016 @ 12:00am
アゼム Mar 20, 2016 @ 12:04am 
Considering multiple things have already referenced previous games as "long ago" this is pretty much proven wrong already
Roland of Gilead Mar 20, 2016 @ 1:30am 
Originally posted by Blaze:
Originally posted by Hobo Misanthropus:


Because Miyazaki is trying very hard to scrub away the memory of DS2. As he should.

He doesn't hate DS 2 and on that note, he's giving the same treatment to DS1.

When someone asked him at a q&a if soul memory would be a thing in ds3 he didnt respond he just looked away and smiled.
BlazeRomulus Mar 20, 2016 @ 1:31am 
Originally posted by Havel "The Rock" Johnson:
Originally posted by Blaze:

He doesn't hate DS 2 and on that note, he's giving the same treatment to DS1.

When someone asked him at a q&a if soul memory would be a thing in ds3 he didnt respond he just looked away and smiled.

Nobody liked Soul Memory, yes, but if i recall there's quite a few things he took from DS 2 and put them in DS 3.
Teagan Mar 20, 2016 @ 2:38am 
When the Bells of Awakening toll, the heirs of fire rise. In Dark Souls 1 there was only one heir of fire who could be resurrected - Gwyn, Lord of Cinder. In Dark Souls 3 there are more. I think it's pretty safe to say Dark Souls 3 is a sequel.

This is also just a theory though, but it does give a bit more meaning to the word "awakening".
The devourer of god ate the dark sun and took Hideyoshi's form, so 3 must be after 1. Another evidence is the absence of princess boobs, or at least her illusion.
I didn't find much link between 2 and the other games though.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 21 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Mar 19, 2016 @ 8:23pm
Posts: 21