Anyone have a gtx 970m?

[Grim Abstract]

What kind of fps are you getting?

[AtomicSamurai]

i got one !! hmm for the most part 60 fps, hmm with drops to 50 ocassionally, i got AO to low i think, AA off, shadows LOW, everything else max i think.

[Grim Abstract]

Originally posted by PhantomLimb:

i got one !! hmm for the most part 60 fps, hmm with drops to 50 ocassionally, i got AO to low i think, AA off, shadows LOW, everything else max i think.

awesome, thanks for the reply!

[Kartoffelsuppe]

I did a quick benchmark with fraps yesterday (running through starter zone). Everything maxed out but motion blur, resolution was 900p (1600x900).

avg FPS: 60
min FPS: 53

[draganot]

1920x1080 on high about 40fps or so. Switching settings to low, medium, or max seems to leave Fps about the same without much difference. Which is really weird.

[Kartoffelsuppe]

Originally posted by draganot:

Switching settings to low, medium, or max seems to leave Fps about the same without much difference. Which is really weird.

The game is not optimized very well, this is "intended" behaviour. However you can still squeeze a few FPS out of the game if you really need them:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIOnaDvWHDg

[gackie]

Originally posted by lolibus:

Originally posted by draganot:

Switching settings to low, medium, or max seems to leave Fps about the same without much difference. Which is really weird.

The game is not optimized very well, this is "intended" behaviour. However you can still squeeze a few FPS out of the game if you really need them:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIOnaDvWHDg

They never said anything about the poor optimization being intended. Every AAA title suffers from horrible optimization post launch. Especially when they were made for PC instead of just being ported.

[draganot]

Originally posted by Hat Skeleton!:

Originally posted by lolibus:

The game is not optimized very well, this is "intended" behaviour. However you can still squeeze a few FPS out of the game if you really need them:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIOnaDvWHDg

They never said anything about the poor optimization being intended. Every AAA title suffers from horrible optimization post launch. Especially when they were made for PC instead of just being ported.

It would be better if games were all developed specifically for PC and ported to consoles. That way PC games get great optimization, plenty of graphical options, and a PC friendly UI. Then the console ports would also be good because the console player base is very large and would make a huge fuss about the same ♥♥♥♥ PC has to put up with and end up getting a proper game. It's a win-win for gamers everywhere. And I guess I'll give the guide a shot. Nothing really seems to change the fps anyway unless I just missed something.

[Okami]

add the game manually inside your game list in nvidia control panel if he is not already there, then set the gpu to work at full speed as soon as the game launch

[asahi.]

i think im kinda late but im ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ suffering with gtx970m. never reach even 40 fps

[Panokkio]

Originally posted by draganot:

1920x1080 on high about 40fps or so. Switching settings to low, medium, or max seems to leave Fps about the same without much difference. Which is really weird.

Sounds like CPU bottleneck then

[Hunubul]

Originally posted by 하나 둘 셋 롱주 화이팅:

i think im kinda late but im ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ suffering with gtx970m. never reach even 40 fps

You are a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ YEAR LATE