Am i really the only person who found Dark Souls 3 terrible?

[Meanie]

I can't find anyone, i'm starting to believe that i must have a disease or something.

No one else realises how bad the game is? How they made it so artificiallity difficulty thanks to this ♥♥♥♥ casual community? "DARK SOULS SUEPR HARD XDDDDDD"

They had everything to make a decent sequel, to make what DS2 was supposed to be, but they ended up makind it as bad as DS2, sometimes even worst!

While on DS1 things where balence and you INDEEND just needed to "GIT GUD", DS3 is complete ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥t. The game doesn't punish you for doing something wrong, it's just straight ♥♥♥♥ YOU the entire time!

I go to bad reviews and i only see people complaining about crashes (seriously from?) that is not happening to be, but HELL the multiplayer glitches are...

NO ONE IS POINTING OUT HOW TERRIBLE THE GAME IS IN SO MANY ASPECTS! WHAT IS GOING ON?

Dark Souls 3 is nothing but a patchwork on the mud, since they took everything from Demon Souls, DS2 and Bloodborne (gameplay, mechanics, etc.), but ONLY references, items and fanservices from DS1.

The realistic balanced gameplay is what made DS1 reach it's golden throne. DS3 sucks some huge donkey balls.

(i didin't even mentioned constant ambushes, lack of criativity, boring bosses, bland boring maps, etc. etc. etc.)

inb4: Die-hard fanboys making fun out of / getting mad at anyone who doesn't think this crap game is good.

[Erebus]

Цитата допису ☼ Jamchow ☼:

I know this was posted in April, and some people bumped it, but you're not going to complain about lack of bosses? Dark Souls 3 had 19 bosses without DLC. The first Dark Souls had 24, or so. I don't know how many Dark Souls 2 had, but probably more than 19.

Quality > quantity

DS2 has the most bosses, but some of them are hilariously phoned in.

[Merilirem]

Цитата допису FishWaffle:

Цитата допису Erebus the Indolent:

People are lying to themselves if they treat any of From's recent titles as near-perfection. All of them are flawed and most of them have rather poor balancing. They are all enjoyable games though if you take each one by itself. Comparison really just shows how flawed each title is.

I totally agree here, it's just wrong to call DS1 "perfect" when it had it's problems too.

Ds1 may not have been perfect, since nothing is, however it had good parts about it, which were lost completely by DS3.

The "fast paced" combat is not as well done and actually kinda cringy.

Many of the mechanics just don't do much, especially related heavy set ups which kinda references the previous.

The boss diversity is lacking, no goat demons or anything, its all basically a giant boss in an open area.

The area's could have been great, they were again lacking real thought and care. For the most part.

ALOT of instances where gear on enemies is for them only, you can't kill everything and take their stuff, which again, is annoying. Seeing an item in game and not having a way to get it, is just sad.

Enemies don't feel like they could be you anymore, just a pet peve that enemies seem to run on different mechanics and are just relatively bigger than they used to be.

THis is just stuff off the top of my head, but DS1 did not have anywhere near problems like this. Its not that changing how the game works is the problem, they just have yet to do a good job of it, and it would take an overhaul to get it up to the standards of DS1. Its not impossible, but so many strange decisions that make no sense, so many corners cut, the game is not half as good as DS1 and i can easily debate that with anyone who uses logic.

Technological upgrades and such do not count when comparing how good the game is, tech advances with time and even a terrible game can "haz pretty graffics =D!.."

Don't get me wrong, its good enough to play and still better than alot of its competition, but its no DS1.

[Jamchow]

Цитата допису Erebus the Indolent:

Цитата допису ☼ Jamchow ☼:

I know this was posted in April, and some people bumped it, but you're not going to complain about lack of bosses? Dark Souls 3 had 19 bosses without DLC. The first Dark Souls had 24, or so. I don't know how many Dark Souls 2 had, but probably more than 19.

Quality > quantity

DS2 has the most bosses, but some of them are hilariously phoned in.

Yeah, but some of the Dark Souls 3 bosses weren't all that good, but I found the Nameless King to be challenging.

[gackie]

Цитата допису ☼ Jamchow ☼:

I know this was posted in April, and some people bumped it, but you're not going to complain about lack of bosses? Dark Souls 3 had 19 bosses without DLC. The first Dark Souls had 24, or so. I don't know how many Dark Souls 2 had, but probably more than 19.

The first Dark Souls had 22. That's only 3 more. And can we point out that 3 of those were the same boss?

[Aryend]

Цитата допису Hat Skeleton!:

Цитата допису ☼ Jamchow ☼:

I know this was posted in April, and some people bumped it, but you're not going to complain about lack of bosses? Dark Souls 3 had 19 bosses without DLC. The first Dark Souls had 24, or so. I don't know how many Dark Souls 2 had, but probably more than 19.

The first Dark Souls had 22. That's only 3 more. And can we point out that 3 of those were the same boss?

Yup, basically exactly the same except that tutorial one doesn't have the AoE

[dingustus]

Цитата допису Merilirem:

Цитата допису FishWaffle:

I totally agree here, it's just wrong to call DS1 "perfect" when it had it's problems too.

Ds1 may not have been perfect, since nothing is, however it had good parts about it, which were lost completely by DS3.

The "fast paced" combat is not as well done and actually kinda cringy.

Many of the mechanics just don't do much, especially related heavy set ups which kinda references the previous.

The boss diversity is lacking, no goat demons or anything, its all basically a giant boss in an open area.

The area's could have been great, they were again lacking real thought and care. For the most part.

ALOT of instances where gear on enemies is for them only, you can't kill everything and take their stuff, which again, is annoying. Seeing an item in game and not having a way to get it, is just sad.

Enemies don't feel like they could be you anymore, just a pet peve that enemies seem to run on different mechanics and are just relatively bigger than they used to be.

THis is just stuff off the top of my head, but DS1 did not have anywhere near problems like this. Its not that changing how the game works is the problem, they just have yet to do a good job of it, and it would take an overhaul to get it up to the standards of DS1. Its not impossible, but so many strange decisions that make no sense, so many corners cut, the game is not half as good as DS1 and i can easily debate that with anyone who uses logic.

Technological upgrades and such do not count when comparing how good the game is, tech advances with time and even a terrible game can "haz pretty graffics =D!.."

Don't get me wrong, its good enough to play and still better than alot of its competition, but its no DS1.

First off, I just got to say here, thank you for putting a logical response then just going calling me a "stupid fanboy" or whatever. And I do agree, it has it's shortcomings. With areas I feel it's hit or miss for me. Irrythil is amazing and the dungeons can be legit creepy at times, but Farron is just... well Farron is a swamp. They made a lot of odd choices like not getting invaded when you beat a boss, or only getting to summon 2 red phantoms. And I'm glad I'm not the only one who finds it odd that even a basic hollow manages to be taller then me. But I feel DS3 has a lot of potential to be one of the best Souls games if they fix these issues with the new DLC. It's bosses are amazing, it has some great lore, and it has a lot of cool items (sadly however most people only use metas so the pvp is very lacking.) We'll all just have to wait to see if FROM can fix these with the DLC.

[gackie]

Цитата допису Aryend:

Цитата допису Hat Skeleton!:

The first Dark Souls had 22. That's only 3 more. And can we point out that 3 of those were the same boss?

Yup, basically exactly the same except that tutorial one doesn't have the AoE

So basiclaly you could say DS1 has 20 bosses. Which is 1 more.

[Nevict]

I liked Dark Souls 2 more compared to the other chapters. Seriously, the way the character holds his longsword when you press Y is a huge step back. I liked DS2 animations more.

[gackie]

Цитата допису Nevict:

I liked Dark Souls 2 more compared to the other chapters. Seriously, the way the character holds his longsword when you press Y is a huge step back. I liked DS2 animations more.

It was more realistic. That's l can say there.

[Paf Le Loup]

[Meat Man (Alfons)]

Цитата допису Peasant:

I don't know about the old days but at least nowdays with the internet where everyone can be a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ genious,

humanity is just straight 100% stupid in general

after reading your resposnes i kinda want to kill myself now

i won't lose my time explaining obvious ♥♥♥♥ to blind people who can't see it. In the end nothing will ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ change, From will never do a decent souls game again, they will only fill their damn pockets with money from console casuals and you all suls hard xdd praisers...

What does this even mean?

[Titan Exodos]

down to 7.5k average players in the past 30 days. now irillyth really is a ghost town bun dun tssst

[Aryend]

Цитата допису Meat Man (Alfons):

Цитата допису Peasant:

I don't know about the old days but at least nowdays with the internet where everyone can be a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ genious,

humanity is just straight 100% stupid in general

after reading your resposnes i kinda want to kill myself now

i won't lose my time explaining obvious ♥♥♥♥ to blind people who can't see it. In the end nothing will ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ change, From will never do a decent souls game again, they will only fill their damn pockets with money from console casuals and you all suls hard xdd praisers...

What does this even mean?

Means that he ran out of arguments (if he had any to begin with) and resorted to insults and console shaming, which is kinda ironic given this series was born on consoles...

[gackie]

Цитата допису Aryend:

Цитата допису Meat Man (Alfons):

What does this even mean?

Means that he ran out of arguments (if he had any to begin with) and resorted to insults and console shaming which is kinda ironic given this series was born on consoles...

ayy lmao

[Meat Man (Alfons)]

Цитата допису Riker:

Finished the game about 30mins ago
OP is talking out of his ass

I love how he talks about "artificial difficulty" then how he stunlocked everything to death....That doesnt seem like dificult to me

Just use poise.

Right?