İn a scale of 1 to 100 how hard is this?

[Umutnulleins]

and will i get cancer?

[Dragon Unityr]

what is "this"?

[True Survivor]

45 maybe.

[Umutnulleins]

Originally posted by Dragon Unity:

what is "this"?

*the game*

[EF_Neo1st]

Playing solo (without any other player help), blind (without checking wiki or other players advises) and being your first souls game (or souls-like, ocnsidering you have not played any souls-like game), DS3 is like 90 out of 100. (the best experience the game can provide in terms of PvE).

Playing with help, knowing everything from wiki and other players advises and not being your first souls game, DS3 is like 10 out of 100 or "watch" out of 100, where the helper may do alll the work while you just sit and watch. (the worst experience, will kill your first solo experience, considering you try solo after beating the game with help, and will also kill all the exploration part of the game).

[Dao Fei Xiao]

Would say around 75 of 100, DS1 and DS2 are definitely harder and more difficult environment wise and maybe enemy wise, so that makes it like at least 85 of 100, but still doable. I think once you learn the game and know what to expect and be prepared and stronger, will decrease the difficulty dramatically for you. 45 would be very acceptable like the previous comment said.

[EF_Neo1st]

Originally posted by Agios Joestar:

Would say around 75 of 100, DS1 and DS2 are definitely harder and more difficult environment wise and maybe enemy wise, so that makes it like at least 85 of 100, but still doable. I think once you learn the game and know what to expect and be prepared and stronger, will decrease the difficulty dramatically for you. 45 would be very acceptable like the previous comment said.

I didnt find it "hard" even because I had DS3 and DS2 when I stated playing DS series, and while I was stuck at the beginning of DS3, at DS2 I had already killed 2 bosses, the giant and the giant at heide, DS3 I was stuck behind ludex Gundyr . . . prob because DS2 is much slower.

[Dao Fei Xiao]

Originally posted by EF_Neo1st:

Originally posted by Agios Joestar:

Would say around 75 of 100, DS1 and DS2 are definitely harder and more difficult environment wise and maybe enemy wise, so that makes it like at least 85 of 100, but still doable. I think once you learn the game and know what to expect and be prepared and stronger, will decrease the difficulty dramatically for you. 45 would be very acceptable like the previous comment said.

I didnt find it "hard" even because I had DS3 and DS2 when I stated playing DS series, and while I was stuck at the beginning of DS3, at DS2 I had already killed 2 bosses, the giant and the giant at heide, DS3 I was stuck behind ludex Gundyr . . . prob because DS2 is much slower.

I was actually talking to the OP and the last comment for me by the time I was typing this was from another user, True Survivor. Personally, I didn't struggled at Gundyr, got him on my first try by just sticking close to him and circling around and attacking once in a while, I had picked a Knight, though, that's why it was easier for me, I also had a lot of experience coming from the original DS2 and Bloodborne, so, I kinda knew what I was getting in to with DS3. Difficulty wise by enemies, I really can't say much, but I had more struggles in DS2/DS2SotFS and in DS1/DSR than I ever had in DS3. I think at some point it comes down to personal experience and understanding, so, no matter what we say to the OP, they will have to see for themselves.

[Shizzled]

For me it was 85,because i never played ds1 and 2,but in time you learn everything,and it will be less harder.Oh and watch out of invaders cuz they will make your whole game back to 85

[ChubbNutt]

Originally posted by True Survivor:

45 maybe.

This.
There are much harder games.

[Umutnulleins]

Originally posted by OriginalUserName:

Originally posted by Agios Joestar:

Would say around 75 of 100, DS1 and DS2 are definitely harder and more difficult environment wise and maybe enemy wise, so that makes it like at least 85 of 100, but still doable. I think once you learn the game and know what to expect and be prepared and stronger, will decrease the difficulty dramatically for you. 45 would be very acceptable like the previous comment said.

DS1 is definitely easier(bosses and enemies), especially at the start. You get better weapons, better armor, better poise(lol poise), more estus, slower enemies(good for shields) and your equip load levels with your endurance. Humanity is good for emergency-healing and you can find a lot more of it than divine blessings or embers.
DS2's worst/best boss is its hitbox system. Also: lifegems.

tried to play ds2 but refunded it before i could even kill an enemy wanna know why?


♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ pc controls

[rabureta]

Originally posted by Joseph Seed:

İn a scale of 1 to 100 how hard is this??

50

Originally posted by Joseph Seed:

and will i get cancer?

only if you pvp

[Arpenser]

25 maybe
It's because I've played Sekiro first so, DS3 was relatively way easier.

[eff]

like the vodka huh

[The Fountaineer 🖋]

If you havent played a Souls game before, I’d say 80-90, with 100 being unplayable or rage inducing. If youre a returning player, maybe a 65-75, due to t still being a hectic game with fast combat.

Me, I really like chaos style combat with BLoodborne being my number one of all time. So dks3 feels like a 50ish~ below for me.

[primobrainlet]

Like, a 50? Pretty average difficulty imo, just a steep learning curve. Its really not as hard as people make it out to be.

Even if you have poor reflexes and a hard time with patterns, you can just do the maths to get a crazy overpowered build going and stomp everything anyways

Now as for the cancer, that depends on if you use miracle builds