Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
isn't that nice?
Vigor 40
Endurance 35
Strength 40 but 45 with Knight's ring
Dexterity 16
I like moveset taht has good chance for hitting someone iwth high damage.
IM using sun armor, my weight is usually aroudn 50 and I have Havel's Ring on +3 from a friend.
both weapontypes have useful running attacks. The running attack from curved greatswords are slightly superior, but really not by much. The problem with UGS running attack is big recovery time which leaves you open for a backstep if used carelessly.
the rolling attacks from the UGS are way better than the of a curved greatsword. UGS rolling attacks are way faster and have bigger range.
UGS 2 handed r1s are unparryable. The curved greatsword r1s are faster but the hyperarmor on UGS is better. Rollcatching with curved greatswords is better. So you can make a case for both weapontypes
heavy attacks of UGS are imo easier to hit than curved greatsword heavy. I think i never even got hit once by a curved greatsword heavy.