DARK SOULS™ III

DARK SOULS™ III

View Stats:
Wolfram Apr 4, 2017 @ 11:16pm
Does it work with a NVIDIA GTX 950m?
as the witcher 3 runs on high settings with constant 30 fps I am not that sure whether dark souls would not run...

And btw: Is it fairer than ds2? I am stuck at the f*cking ruin sentinels. Anything that unfair in ds3?
< >
Showing 1-15 of 20 comments
Dustbloom Apr 4, 2017 @ 11:17pm 
o.o
Ds3 Runs on my 720TI, should be MORE than enough on 950.

As far as fairness, I hated DS2. I'm a huge fan of 3 personally.
It's steam yo! Try it. If you don't like it, refund it. :D
Wolfram Apr 4, 2017 @ 11:18pm 
Thank you very much for your fast answer, mate!
Erebus Apr 4, 2017 @ 11:18pm 
I doubt it would run great with a laptop CPU. I mean you can always try it and refund if you deem it unplayable... but you've got pretty weak hardware from the sound of things.
Dustbloom Apr 4, 2017 @ 11:19pm 
Currently run on lowest settings with a 720, 60 FPS. :) Can run @ 30 on high, I simply chose the higher frames for PVP. :3
Erebus Apr 4, 2017 @ 11:20pm 
Originally posted by Meliodas:
720TI
That's not a thing.

Game depends a little more on CPU than GPU anyway though.
Wolfram Apr 4, 2017 @ 11:21pm 
well, the cpu is 2,7 to 3.5 quad core cpu
Erebus Apr 4, 2017 @ 11:22pm 
Originally posted by ImmersingShadow:
well, the cpu is 2,7 to 3.5 quad core cpu
Doesn't say much, what's the model. Frequency and core counts don't mean much without knowing the architecture.
I run this game at 720p with the 950M. It runs 60 frames with dips to 30 especially at Archdragon Peak. I'd say it is playable.
Wolfram Apr 4, 2017 @ 11:29pm 
well, I had a look at a review of the cpu and it says it´s about as good as the Core i7-4900MQ and capable of running current games without problems...
BloodRaideN Apr 4, 2017 @ 11:30pm 
Currently using 960m, on high settings and depending on amount of activity on screen..
40-50fps @ 1366x768
30-40fps @ 1600x900
20-30fps @ 1920x1080

running on low settings add 5fps to above values
Wolfram Apr 4, 2017 @ 11:32pm 
that seems kinda decent imo... i am used to playing with low fps on low settings as that´s all my former laptop was capable of - even with older games like mass effect 2.
Erebus Apr 4, 2017 @ 11:33pm 
Originally posted by ImmersingShadow:
that seems kinda decent imo... i am used to playing with low fps on low settings as that´s all my former laptop was capable of - even with older games like mass effect 2.
Best thing to do is to try it then, and refund it if it's just not playable by your standards.
kml Apr 4, 2017 @ 11:34pm 
Playing it on GTX860M, a fairly simillar GPU. In its current state you'll get a solid 30FPS on 720p on mid to high settings.
SirMotor Apr 4, 2017 @ 11:58pm 
I have
"i7-6700HQ 2.60GHz"
"GTX 950M"
"8G RAM"
on my laptop.

I wonder I can run it at 1920x1080 resolution.
Wolfram Apr 4, 2017 @ 11:59pm 
Originally posted by BloodRaideN:
Currently using 960m, on high settings and depending on amount of activity on screen..
40-50fps @ 1366x768
30-40fps @ 1600x900
20-30fps @ 1920x1080

running on low settings add 5fps to above values


I guess not...
< >
Showing 1-15 of 20 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Apr 4, 2017 @ 11:16pm
Posts: 20