Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Ariamis is either the Painter of the Painted World of Ariamis, or the one whom restored it (much like Ariandel had his own).
That is a massive and baseless assumption... don't use the word confirmation again, please.
Clearly the child isn't Priscilla, but it's her mother's words which were not forgotten, rather than any particular individual. That being said, is doesn't matter whether a being is remembered or not, that has nothing to do with being drawn into the Painted World. It is solely to do with the being having 'no place' in the outside world.
Aside from that, it was clear from DS1 that some things were forcibly placed within the Painted World by the gods to ensure they were not used against them (were kept hidden).
Priscilla is the only known being to have possessed the Lifehunt Scythe, and Aldrich (a seer) very likely perceived her as a result of consuming Gwyndolin, whom seems (when analysing the lore) to have been very much aware of the Painted World and most likely Priscilla's presence within it.
The Painter and Priscilla obviously have differences, but are markedly similar as well. However, appearance is often a terrible way of assuming relation. Take a look at Gwyndolin and Gwynevere.
I'm going to stop here, because I don't have the energy or desire to properly argue against this... simply because...
That makes me want to cut my wrists in and of itself.
The other theory about ocelotte is that it's gundyr, he was meant to link the fire but ultimately he was to late, thus he became a guardian to ensure a worthy heir to link the fire.
the girl is definetly not ariamis... it's is highly believed that she's the child of priscilla, mainly because she resembles her but not completely, implying that priscilla made her with a human/god (we dont know who exactly) and that's why the girl doestn resemble her mother in all the aspects. she probably is of gwyn lineage, because it's theoriesed that priscilla is the crossbreed of seath the scaleless and gwynevere (the daughter of gwyn)
remember that this is a timeline separate from dark souls 1, meaning that while in dark souls 1 we kill priscilla and ornstein, they had another path in this one. gwyndolin included (he was killed by aldrich)
also it is theoriesed that bloodborne is the world the girl eventually created, it fits the description of a cold, dark and very gentle place (kinda...) but that s only and only speculation.
Manus, the statement itself is confirmation. "Ken to fire" - akin to fire. Gwyn in his prime was the lord of fire. Of everything I'm written, that's the one thing I'm sure of. But I'll do some more research and leaf through what's available and see what I've missed.
Wirb, I'd actually missed that, good call.
Skry, I partially agree with that first theory about Ocelotte, but I feel there's a possible implication that it survived Oceiros dashing it against the floor in his prior dialogue. The possibility of invisibility hadn't occurred to me - that's an interesting piece of detail. I was operating on the belief that Ocelotte's murder (or attempted murder) had happened in the distant past, and that Oceiros was reliving a memory during the fight, having already well and truly descended into insanity. For a draconic being, he looks quite... hollow.
The possibility of the painter being Priscilla's daughter had crossed my mind as well, though it makes me wonder who the dead, propped-up figure in Ariandel's boss room is. She definitely isn't Priscilla; if you pull out a bow and look at her face, she's got both the wrong features and wrong skin colour, not to mention the fact that she's both quite a bit smaller and has no tail. To me, Priscilla's existence is implied by that to be so far in the past that the inhabitants of the painting have well and truly forgotten her, allowing Friede and Ariandel to supplant her and use her memory to maintain authority.
Again, it looks like I'm going to need to another lore dive, though. It looks like I'm missing too much information to say anything with confidence here.