Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Not tomorrow but in 2018?
I agree with trenches and some anti-tank barriers but using crew to entrench vehicles will take so much time and could be hard to do in fast battles but yea it could be made better than how it works now.
I would like to see that crew give some bonuses when they run the vehicles because now even man with bazooka can drive tank and he is just as good as a brigadier.
Well I don't feel the need to build trenches, but certainly the idea of a ss4 2.0 is not bad as ssf was ss1 2.0.
It would make sense to compile a 2.0 version with a compilation of all the improvements suggested on this forum. And also sell it as ssf was sold separately.
I already submitted this idea to Devs.
@albero good idea
@warzkins sometime MP start slow/freezing but only in early phase after that it goes ok! But people had already left game (Fkk)
@hillie good wrdd
However anti-tank barriers or barbed wire are welcome :)
Well maybe those little holes which are in few missions could be better. Where 1 soldier can hide. Now defending in bushes or forest giving big bonuses and its good too.