Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
what you should be thinking of is. what should i be doing dual wielding 2 1 hands or strapping a shield on for greater survivability.
Dual wield has the advantage that you get twice as many chances to proc weapon effects.
Dual Wield also costs more skill-points, which is a tradeoff.
My bad, was thinking of wand, where you can put points into dual-wield + wands.
Anyway, your crit chance should be roughly 25+%. So, every other round. Hardly rarely.
As I said before, range is much better on 2-handed weapons. Not everything is about raw weapon DPS, especially in this game. You can attack from further away without crossing potentially dangerous ground. Also, warrior abilities like whirlwind are affected by your weapon range.
Both are good, but to say unconditionally better is to ignore dynamic battlefield conditions.
It is necessary to max out 2 handed skill though, same goes for crossbows. Old bonuses from original game were pretty bad.
I think i will go with Dual wielding because it looks cooler :)