Theory: Is Ubisoft Abstergo?

[_galaxy]

I came up with this while playing some assassins creed games.

Beware that it contains spoilers for assassins creed 3 that can break the experience of assassins creed 1, 2, brotherhood, revelations and 3!

I'm gonna write some really bad ♥♥♥♥ here but in no way I want to offend anyone (especially ubisoft) but it is that this theory is sooooo bizzare, and I got no other place to write it lol.

Moving on.

1#

On Assassin's Creed 4 you gotta play as an abstergo employee and they say you are a "beta tester", and so you get on the Edward Kenway adventures (BTW best AC game of all time).
Well if you are a beta tester, you're the only? I mean look we only got like 20 people at that floor, and most of them would be coders right.

And that could be the amount of people that worked on AC Unity!

Not to mention the people that were jerking off the main hall :P (that was more people than the ones working btw)

2#

Still on AC4, we get to see all that ♥♥♥♥ that happens on the company, like the crazy CEO, the ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up policys and also all that crazy stuff that you see on the ending of the game.
Could that be what actually happens at Ubisoft? And why all this happens on their games?

3#

On the AC series we see that a war that we don't even know is going on, from the creation of the language to the very release of the new AC syndicate DLC it came somewhere these days (I think).

Could that relate to... the "war" ubisoft is currently in?

Even from the earliest days of consoles ubisoft tries their best to stop piracy, with DRM and all they can think of. So could the "Assassin's" be the people that piracy their games?

On assassin's creed 3 ubisoft is maybe trying to pass a message by killing desmond saying "you can't win us". We all see that desmond is using an illegal copy of Animus and violanting the Abstergo policys.

In exchange that doesn't stop the assassin's from actually doing their work, only their great leader.

Ubisoft true quest for the apple means they could make any game with any price and everyone buy it, and by destroying the assassin's order would mean no piracy at all.

4#

OR

The Assassin's could actually be: The Community!

The modern day assassin's will continue looking through their antecessors in search of answers, while Abstergo gets money with that

The assassin's would be actually the critical part of the costumers, to say "no, you can't exchange this game for this price because this and that" while the templars say the opposite. The apple could change that.

Killing desmond could also mean that ubisoft is trying to say "no, we will exchange for this price and the assassin's can't argue with us)

Not only they also make the assassin's killing templars thing bad from the view of the player, because did you never feel bad when killing a templar character on the game? Tell me. That way, they try to say the templar are good guys and the assassin's should became templars (AC ROGUE).

(Remember when desmond father said that the templars were hiding on fallout bunkers? Wouldn't that be the DRM?)




Toughts?

[robthebob11]

I've been saying since Watch Dogs that Ubisoft has become Abstergo and therefore The Templars. Yeah, I think the metaphor is intentionally implied but I think they've untintentionally taken it a step farther with some shady business practices.

So basically I think Ubisoft meant the parallel to be tongue-in-cheek, then untinentonally made the parallel work even better by becoming an evil corporation in real life.

[_galaxy]

Originally posted by robthebob11:

I've been saying since Watch Dogs that Ubisoft has become Abstergo and therefore The Templars. Yeah, I think the metaphor is intentionally implied but I think they've untintentionally taken it a step farther with some shady business practices.

So basically I think Ubisoft meant the parallel to be tongue-in-cheek, then untinentonally made the parallel work even better by becoming an evil corporation in real life.

Imagine if Ubisoft had the apple of Eden that qould be VERY bad

[uWot]

Abstergo is less Greedy than Ubisoft,so this Theory is blown up.

[_galaxy]

Originally posted by uWot:

Abstergo is less Greedy than Ubisoft,so this Theory is blown up.

Abstergo goal is world control not money. Money wouldn't be necessary if you control an entire world right?

Also even if this theory was true wtf dude abstergo is an company of an alternative universe not like ubisoft and abstergo do stuff togheter

[Sir Noob Wulf]

Originally posted by ℜenato ℒopes ⌬:

I came up with this while playing some assassins creed games.

Beware that it contains spoilers for assassins creed 3 that can break the experience of assassins creed 1, 2, brotherhood, revelations and 3!

I'm gonna write some really bad ♥♥♥♥ here but in no way I want to offend anyone (especially ubisoft) but it is that this theory is sooooo bizzare, and I got no other place to write it lol.

Moving on.

1#

On Assassin's Creed 4 you gotta play as an abstergo employee and they say you are a "beta tester", and so you get on the Edward Kenway adventures (BTW best AC game of all time).
Well if you are a beta tester, you're the only? I mean look we only got like 20 people at that floor, and most of them would be coders right.

And that could be the amount of people that worked on AC Unity!

Not to mention the people that were jerking off the main hall :P (that was more people than the ones working btw)

2#

Still on AC4, we get to see all that ♥♥♥♥ that happens on the company, like the crazy CEO, the ♥♥♥♥ed up policys and also all that crazy stuff that you see on the ending of the game.
Could that be what actually happens at Ubisoft? And why all this happens on their games?

3#

On the AC series we see that a war that we don't even know is going on, from the creation of the language to the very release of the new AC syndicate DLC it came somewhere these days (I think).

Could that relate to... the "war" ubisoft is currently in?

Even from the earliest days of consoles ubisoft tries their best to stop piracy, with DRM and all they can think of. So could the "Assassin's" be the people that piracy their games?

On assassin's creed 3 ubisoft is maybe trying to pass a message by killing desmond saying "you can't win us". We all see that desmond is using an illegal copy of Animus and violanting the Abstergo policys.

In exchange that doesn't stop the assassin's from actually doing their work, only their great leader.

Ubisoft true quest for the apple means they could make any game with any price and everyone buy it, and by destroying the assassin's order would mean no piracy at all.

4#

OR

The Assassin's could actually be: The Community!

The modern day assassin's will continue looking through their antecessors in search of answers, while Abstergo gets money with that

The assassin's would be actually the critical part of the costumers, to say "no, you can't exchange this game for this price because this and that" while the templars say the opposite. The apple could change that.

Killing desmond could also mean that ubisoft is trying to say "no, we will exchange for this price and the assassin's can't argue with us)

Not only they also make the assassin's killing templars thing bad from the view of the player, because did you never feel bad when killing a templar character on the game? Tell me. That way, they try to say the templar are good guys and the assassin's should became templars (AC ROGUE).

(Remember when desmond father said that the templars were hiding on fallout bunkers? Wouldn't that be the DRM?)




Toughts?

Dude if ubisoft IS abstergo,why on earth would they want everyone to know what they are doing?

[_galaxy]

it's just a theory they are not actually abstergo.

....


or are they? hahahahahah!!!