Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
Sister Grimm
Magik
Wolverine
Blade
Mephisto
Scarlet Witch
Captain America
Lilith
Spider-Man
Captain Marvel
Agatha Harkness
Iron Man
Sabretooth
Venom
Doctor Strange
Ghost Rider
Hulk
Caretaker
Crossbones
What get's me is she keeps trying to do stuff behind the rest of the team's backs. I understand the first time to a point, even though she just needs to grow a pair and speak out in the open instead of passive aggressively talking ♥♥♥♥ all the time and doing what she wants anyway. After you have the big teamwork talk and officially take the mantle of leadership she wants to do more to save Wanda behind everyone's backs. I'm fine with her suggesting it, but why can't Hunter just straight up say, "If this is the only way, then we need to pursue it. However, we need to bring this to the rest of the team and make a plan as a team." Then, Nico would likely object with some attitude and nonsense, after which Hunter should forcefully remind her that she said she was cool with Hunter taking the reins, and that Hunter has made their decision. Hunter could then explain going behind the teams backs and keeping secrets was part of the problem before, and here you are, Nico, hypocritically doing what she despises in the Avengers.
We're a team, we bring everything to the team, we decide as a team, and since the whole team is fine with me being the leader, I get the final say. I'd be so over their silly bickering, I already told them once that ♥♥♥♥ ends now at the leadership meeting, what happened to that? Undermine me once, shame on you, undermine me twice shame on me and you aren't getting a chance to do it a third time.
It happens - an actor’s appearance, voice, mannerisms, style, etc becoming a part of that character’s contemporary image (think Ledger’s Joker, Depp’s Jack Sparrow, etc).
The issue though is that they went knock-off RDJ.
They tried to emulate RDJ’s Iron Man but without his voice, his likeness, etc.
It would one thing if they just did an entirely separate portrayal, but this feels like someone who kinda looks and sounds like RDJ dressing up as Tony Stark and doing their impersonation.
They should have done their own interpretation based on the comics. They did their own thing with Wolverine without batting an eye. I would have based him off the 90s cartoon if it were me, or Huge Ackman if I could get him on board. Weird they did the latter with Iron Man and not for Wolverine, I thought Huge Ackman was popular as Wolverine.
My favorite is Wolverine.
Cap+Parker+Magik are ok.
Rest i dont care.
I just roll my eyes every time I see him in the Abbey, I hide behind walls and wait until he walks by.
I like Tony and Strange's banter, and the Gen-Z heroes are delightfully cringe.
Oh, I completely forgot that Agatha gets on my nerves too. In-story, it seems like a lot of problems could've been avoided if she had been just a bit more cautious, the same way Caretaker is annoying because half the time it feels like SHE'S the biggest reason the teams don't work together very well.
RDJ knock off always annoys me, i have 0 interest in the MCU.
nico should maybe, but the VA is pretty good and i feel accurate to exactly what that type of character is supposed to. +1,000 points cause i keep her in the shadow witch suit.
the worst for me is caretaker, so nico gets more points since she doesn't seem to like her.
This is much closer to comic Tony and RDJ. Its actually a super good representation.
You can disagree with a character, and also realize that they are a good character for that reason.
The question being posed was what characters annoy you, not which characters we think are bad or which characters we disagree with. Being annoyed by characters is a legitimate, and probably in this case intended, way to interact with the story.